Image & Video Galleries > Lens Gallery

Canon EF 16-35 2.8L

<< < (3/4) > >>

bhavikk:
Great photos RuneL.

Here are some I've taken with my 16-35 II

Edit:
First looks a little de-saturated once I posted it (I don't have a calabraited monitor). 35mm, 1/4, f2.8 @ ISO 400
Second: 16mm, 1/10, f2.8 @ ISO 1600
Third: 20mm, 1/8, f2.8 @ ISO 1600

baks5523:
Very nice shots of the subway! I own the mkII of this lense and to be honest I wasn't so sure I would use it as much as I have. Now it seems whenever I'm not shooting sports, this is the lense that's on my camera.

Again, well done.

infilm:
Go ahead and save a few bucks. I have seen focus charts of the two lenses and there isn't enough difference to justify the expense. Here is a link to view the focus charts. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=114&Camera=9&FLI=1&API=0&LensComp=412&CameraComp=9&FLIComp=1&APIComp=0

Tastino0:


http://www.flickr.com/photos/tastino0/5682932872/




http://www.flickr.com/photos/tastino0/5682923466/





http://www.flickr.com/photos/tastino0/5686558022/





http://www.flickr.com/photos/tastino0/5682361997

DynaMike:
Was there a change/update in AF motor and performance between the I and II? 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page