Gear Talk > Lenses
70-200 f/2.8 USM: why not mkII?
iaind:
--- Quote from: Mt Spokane Photography on June 27, 2012, 01:12:40 PM ---Be thankful they have kept such a supurb lens at a reasonable price. Its noticibly sharper than the MK I IS version. I doubt if it would sell at a $2,000 price after a update, you can always turn IS off on the MK II if you do not need it.
--- End quote ---
Got my nonIS for less than half price of IS mk1. The obvious choice then.
Upgrade is tempting but hardly justifiable at present.
eddiemrg:
As seen on your picture:"gonna catch 'em all!"
--- Quote from: iaind on June 27, 2012, 02:37:05 PM ---
--- Quote from: Mt Spokane Photography on June 27, 2012, 01:12:40 PM ---Be thankful they have kept such a supurb lens at a reasonable price. Its noticibly sharper than the MK I IS version. I doubt if it would sell at a $2,000 price after a update, you can always turn IS off on the MK II if you do not need it.
--- End quote ---
Got my nonIS for less than half price of IS mk1. The obvious choice then.
Upgrade is tempting but hardly justifiable at present.
--- End quote ---
eddiemrg:
so... I've tested the USM IS MKII and it's awesome... now I understand what a stupid question I've done...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version