Any Thing shot with a 1Dx

[nikkito]

Zürich City.
Switzerland [2012]
Canon EOS 1D X.
16-35 L

Multiple Exposure done directly with the camera.

[markphoto]

1Dx  600mm 
when I turned my camera to shoot in portrait mode he turned his  head to match

Excellent shots Gary, thank you for sharing. 

[pwalderh]

Took at day at the racetrack shooting super bikes to test different autofocus settings - super fast and small objects  - ended up a very happy camper

[pwalderh]

Tracking and panning (shot at 1/40 Sec - 300mm)

[JaxPhotoBuff]

70-200 f/2.8 L IS, shot at ISO 400, focal length of 150mm, 1/2000 at f/6.3

[Studio1930]

1DX with a 200 f/2 standing in the pool.

[ChrisAnderson]

1DX with a 200 f/2 standing in the pool.

You're a braver man than I ...wow.  That's pretty much the ultimate combo.

[Moody Blues]

Some B&W's

[Schultzie]

Both of these shot with a 70-200 2.8L IS II


'47 Packard 8 by SauceyJack, on Flickr


Dance to the rhythm by SauceyJack, on Flickr

[Crapking]

CHP Golf-20 by PVC 2012, on Flickr

Camera   Canon EOS-1D X
Exposure   1/2500 sec
Aperture   f/2.0
Focal Length   135 mm (135/2 L)
ISO Speed   200

[Crapking]

CHP Golf-13 by PVC 2012, on Flickr

Camera   Canon EOS-1D X
Exposure   1/2500 sec
Aperture   f/1.6
Focal Length   85 mm  (85/1.2 II L)
ISO Speed   100

[Northstar]

CHP Golf-13 by PVC 2012, on Flickr

Camera   Canon EOS-1D X
Exposure   1/2500 sec
Aperture   f/1.6
Focal Length   85 mm  (85/1.2 II L)
ISO Speed   100

crapking...i also enjoy playing and shooting golf.  I like both your shots, especially the first one.   Do you think the second one would be better if you shot it with a smaller aperture so we could see the ball and the hole the golfer is playing.  just my IMO.

[Crapking]

crapking...i also enjoy playing and shooting golf.  I like both your shots, especially the first one.   Do you think the second one would be better if you shot it with a smaller aperture so we could see the ball and the hole the golfer is playing.  just my IMO.

I did stop down to 1.6 trying to strike a background blur and depth of field balance, but not quite enough obviously.  Was a playing partner that day, and not shooting the event commercially  (plus it was a busy day on the course), so did not really have the time to experiment as much as I'd like. I do have an opportunity the first week of Oct to shoot a charity/celebrity outing so will be able to perfect the photographic shot then - still trying to perfect the GOLF shot after 30+ yrs w/o luck

[Crapking]

CHP Golf-2 by PVC 2012, on Flickr

I went back and found another shot, this time at f4 with the 70-200 2.8 II.
Is this more pleasing?  I originally thought this looked a little "busy", whereas at f 1.6, I thought it was more "dreamy".
At my event in Oct, I will be able to sell my images (donating the proceeds back to the charity though), so which "LOOK" do you think would generate more interest?? I will only get each foursome (player) hitting off of one tee so I need to get it right the first and only time.  Which is preferable ??

[Northstar]

Took at day at the racetrack shooting super bikes to test different autofocus settings - super fast and small objects  - ended up a very happy camper

this might be my favorite shot that i've seen here on CR....just so many great things about this shot.