first pic of canon mirrorless?

[raydream]

saw it on facebook, could it be the real pic or photoshop?

[Minnesota Nice]

I seriously hope it doesn't look like that...

[EchoLocation]

the angles of the right side of the hot shoe and left side look a little funny to me, as do the angles of the top left and top right of the camera. i guess one side(our left) is sloping down more than the right. If it's a mock up on Photoshop it's pretty good. But i'm not convinced.
For not being retro or a classic rangefinder-esque look, i think it actually isn't that fugly.
But unless it is APS-C or FF, I won't even consider it. If it is FF I will probably pre order it(my dream.)

[Mt Spokane Photography]

the angles of the right side of the hot shoe and left side look a little funny to me, as do the angles of the top left and top right of the camera. i guess one side(our left) is sloping down more than the right. If it's a mock up on Photoshop it's pretty good. But i'm not convinced.
For not being retro or a classic rangefinder-esque look, i think it actually isn't that fugly.
But unless it is APS-C or FF, I won't even consider it. If it is FF I will probably pre order it(my dream.)

The hot shoe certainly looks photoshopped, but it could just be from a poor job of editing the image to remove background.
I like the looks of it myself, but then, I go back to the days of the Canon 7 rangefinders, and it is cleaner than they were. 
I'm started to get interested.

[wickidwombat]

i hope it has an electronic viewfinderdoesnt look like it from the pic

from that pic it looks like the sensor is 2x crop? more like a nikon1 sort of deal

an f2 43mm pancake would be pretty sweet if its as sharp as the f2.8 pancake is wide open
of course with a sensor of that size its doF is going to me more like f2.8 anyway so i wonder how similar those lenses are

if its that small it would be handy to have stashed in the bag with an EF adaptor which hopefully would give full control of the lens unlike the EF to otherbrand adaptors

[peederj]

The lens would be an "EF-M" (i.e. mirrorless mount, presumably incompatible with EF and EF-S) f/2 22mm focal length with a 43mm filter thread. STM for focus-by-wire like the EF 40mm f/2.8 pancake.

I am uninterested myself. What I want is a decrippled 700D with no aliasing and moire on the video and 60fps/1080p. Unless this thing sports better video than a hacked GH2, in which case, I am interested provided the EF adapter is under $150 and has full functionality.

[wickidwombat]

EF adapter is under $150 and has full functionality.

.

the camera will live or die on this basis IMO

[kennephoto]

I kinda like it, but I think I'm with everyone else and I'd love it to be FF or APS-C and f2 or faster lenses I'd be sold.

[J]

22mm x 1.6 APS-C = 35.2mm FOV
22mm x 1.85 G1X = 40.7mm FOV

Honestly, I'd be happy with either.

[Vaz]

looks ugly

[dolina]

I hope it is priced competitively to 43rd, Nikon, Pentax and Sony.

[paul13walnut5]

Mirrorless EOS with EF-M mount & 22mm STM pancake?:

http://m.engadget.com/2012/07/20/canon-eos-m-possible-leak/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

[jueming23]

oh S___

[DArora]

SLR Lounge mentions that it has no EVF.. if true, it will be a big bummer. 

[pakosouthpark]

joke?