September 30, 2014, 02:26:26 PM

Author Topic: 1DX vs 5D3  (Read 33285 times)

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #90 on: August 02, 2012, 10:21:13 PM »
Second photo:
2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #90 on: August 02, 2012, 10:21:13 PM »

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #91 on: August 02, 2012, 10:26:50 PM »
So finally, I took the worst lighting, the recliner shot, and post processed each exactly the same way again.

2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #92 on: August 02, 2012, 10:27:46 PM »
1DX photo post processed:
2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #93 on: August 02, 2012, 10:32:34 PM »
Well the white balance was still wrong, so I changed from fluorescent to tungsten, which seemed to be a better match.  Both still had a green tint to it some places.  Also, I had to turn NR up to 80% to get rid of background noise in the shadows.  However, that degraded the 5D3 image more than the 1DX.  However, it looks like the 5D3 got the colors correct.
« Last Edit: August 02, 2012, 10:39:22 PM by bdunbar79 »
2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #94 on: August 02, 2012, 10:33:09 PM »
1DX shot:
2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #95 on: August 02, 2012, 10:38:02 PM »
In these harsh conditions, both camera's photos are equally awful and I don't see any enhanced performance of one or the other.  At least with minimal processing I can't.  I don't think the determing factor for any sane person is going to be high ISO or IQ differences, because they just don't exist.  Speed, shutter durability, AF-point linked spot metering = 1DX.  High MP, high ISO, price = 5D Mark III.

I just am not going to find anything.  I mean, we can argue that the shadows are cleaner on the 1DX or we can pull more detail out of the 5D3's shadows, etc., but it's not significant enough.  The last test will have to be low ISO's, where we saw more green hueing in the shadow areas when people, on a sunny day, were standing in the shade, on the 5D Mark III.  I want to see if the 1DX does this or not.
2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

briansquibb

  • Guest
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #96 on: August 02, 2012, 10:56:09 PM »
@bdunbar79 - you are doing a good job there - thanks for putting the significant amount of time in for this testing.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #96 on: August 02, 2012, 10:56:09 PM »

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #97 on: August 02, 2012, 11:07:28 PM »
Thanks.  My last test will not push either camera.  I will take both to the car show this weekend and we can just casually examine each photo and maybe reach a conclusion or not.  Pushing the cameras is hard to do and it's doubly hard to see any differences in performance with two very high performers anyways. 

It is kind of frustrating because if you remember when the 1Ds Mark III was new you COULD push each camera and see a huge difference as the 1Ds3 just outperformed everything at the time.  Oh well, I think each are great and seem to have their places for use.

I promised you low ISO so I'll do some car show photos but I also want to test the green hue/shadow issue I've noticed on the 5D Mark III in the shade at high sun.
2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

briansquibb

  • Guest
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #98 on: August 02, 2012, 11:18:41 PM »
Thanks.  My last test will not push either camera.  I will take both to the car show this weekend and we can just casually examine each photo and maybe reach a conclusion or not.  Pushing the cameras is hard to do and it's doubly hard to see any differences in performance with two very high performers anyways. 

It is kind of frustrating because if you remember when the 1Ds Mark III was new you COULD push each camera and see a huge difference as the 1Ds3 just outperformed everything at the time.  Oh well, I think each are great and seem to have their places for use.

I promised you low ISO so I'll do some car show photos but I also want to test the green hue/shadow issue I've noticed on the 5D Mark III in the shade at high sun.

Looks like I am going to do some testing of the TSE24 on a 1D4 and 1Ds3, perhaps I will go to the Olympic site just to prove what a friendly place it is :D

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #99 on: August 02, 2012, 11:27:59 PM »
Here's one thing I can say.  If you shoot the WB incorrectly in fluorescent or tungsten temps, you can't correct them in post 100%.  If the camera shoots at those temps to begin with, you can.  Interesting.  It's probably Camera RAW though and not the camera itself, I'm guessing.  What else was interesting, is that when I shot in Cloudy and processed the 5D3 image to Tungsten, it corrected almost there.  The 1DX didn't come close as it was rather green tinted.  This is just interesting playing with these RAW files.

Highlights still can blow in the 1DX images, but not as easily as in the 5D Mark III.  And yeah, it seems the shadows look better from the 5D3 vs. the 1DX, although I suppose that could be from cropping and having less MP's.  Tomorrow I won't crop one of them and examine this. 
2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

wockawocka

  • 7D
  • *****
  • Posts: 388
    • View Profile
    • Wedding Photography
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #100 on: August 03, 2012, 04:21:37 AM »
I've the 1DX and 5D3 and within the ISO ranges of 400-51200 the 1DX smacks the 5D3 with a big wet comedy fish.

And those are the real ranges to test. I'm fed up seeing the 'here's the picture I took with both, what do you think' posts.

I've shot 5 weddings, some 8000 frames in total with the 1DX, almost the same number as the 5D3 and there is so much more than iso range that's an improvement. The Auto White Balance for one is superb. No real white balance corrections to do in post.

The images have miles more clarity to them too, despite losing 4 mp I can retrieve detail I could only dream of with the 5D3, the hair on peoples heads and pollen on flowers being good examples.

ISO1600 - F5 - 1/160

1DX, 5D3 and Hasselblad H Series owner.

canon816

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 211
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #101 on: August 03, 2012, 07:07:08 AM »
Here's one thing I can say.  If you shoot the WB incorrectly in fluorescent or tungsten temps, you can't correct them in post 100%.  If the camera shoots at those temps to begin with, you can.

When you shoot in RAW it does not matter what WB setting you shoot in.  This is simply a preset that communicates to present the JPG rendition or is communicated to editing software to get you close to true neutral grey.

If you shoot in RAW the information in the data file is the same regardless of WB setting.  Much like the NR settings, sharpness settings and picture styles don't matter.  That's the point of RAW.... you have it all there to work with.... ;)

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #102 on: August 03, 2012, 10:06:34 AM »
I've the 1DX and 5D3 and within the ISO ranges of 400-51200 the 1DX smacks the 5D3 with a big wet comedy fish.

And those are the real ranges to test. I'm fed up seeing the 'here's the picture I took with both, what do you think' posts.

I've shot 5 weddings, some 8000 frames in total with the 1DX, almost the same number as the 5D3 and there is so much more than iso range that's an improvement. The Auto White Balance for one is superb. No real white balance corrections to do in post.

The images have miles more clarity to them too, despite losing 4 mp I can retrieve detail I could only dream of with the 5D3, the hair on peoples heads and pollen on flowers being good examples.

ISO1600 - F5 - 1/160



I'm tired of reading "1D-body syndrome" claims whereby the 1DX just destroys the 5D3.  I have seen absolutely NO image ever so far, where this is true, including yours.  Look at Bryan Carnathan's review even.  He says the same thing.  Can you show us please?  We know you think the 1DX is the greatest thing ever, but why?  Can someone please put two photos together to show this?  I cannot.  I've pushed each camera to their limits and I can see no IQ advantage at all.  It may be way better than the 5D3, but can someone show us?
« Last Edit: August 03, 2012, 10:20:21 AM by bdunbar79 »
2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #102 on: August 03, 2012, 10:06:34 AM »

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • ********
  • Posts: 14524
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #103 on: August 03, 2012, 10:44:36 AM »
It may be way better than the 5D3...

Oh, there's no question.  The 1D X is way better than the 5DIII...  Flash back a few years to how the 1DsIII had 'better color rendition' and 'better low ISO performance' and 'whatever' compared to the 5DII, despite the 5DII having a better sensor (according to Canon's white paper on the 5DII/50D).  The theme is the same - there are lots of features that make the 1D X better, but if your main criterion is IQ, you'll save a lot of $/£/€ by getting a 5DIII.   
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

bdunbar79

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2582
    • View Profile
Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #104 on: August 03, 2012, 10:55:22 AM »
It may be way better than the 5D3...

Oh, there's no question.  The 1D X is way better than the 5DIII...  Flash back a few years to how the 1DsIII had 'better color rendition' and 'better low ISO performance' and 'whatever' compared to the 5DII, despite the 5DII having a better sensor (according to Canon's white paper on the 5DII/50D).  The theme is the same - there are lots of features that make the 1D X better, but if your main criterion is IQ, you'll save a lot of $/£/€ by getting a 5DIII.

Ok.  I agree with this.  If IQ is similar, then the 1DX is better overall, over all aspects.  I also agree with the finer detail comment by wocka, I saw this myself in a few landscape shots.  I think the less 4mp is probably not an issue.  Only difference with the 1Ds3 is that camera had 21mp.  Perhaps not an issue.  Thanks.  I still would like to a do a macro shot of a flower with both and see the detail comparison. 
2 x 1DX
Big Ten, GLIAC, NCAC

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 1DX vs 5D3
« Reply #104 on: August 03, 2012, 10:55:22 AM »