April 18, 2014, 03:28:35 PM

Author Topic: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party  (Read 3079 times)

gferdinandsen

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 190
  • was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker
    • View Profile
    • Home
HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« on: August 02, 2012, 07:46:01 PM »
I am looking for advice for HDR software.  I already use CS6, are the 3rd party HDR tools any better than what is out of the box (which does not seem much better than CS5 had)?
1v HS, 5D3, 40D (IR), G1-X, 17-40L, 24-70L (Mk II), 24-105L, 70-200L (2.8 Mk 1), 24 TS-E L (Mk 1), 45 TS-E, 50 1.2L, 100 L Macro -- CPS Gold Membership

canon rumors FORUM

HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« on: August 02, 2012, 07:46:01 PM »

wickidwombat

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 4034
    • View Profile
Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2012, 07:56:42 PM »
Better is relative and highly subjective
Best is using luminosity masks in photoshop
APS-H Fanboy

skitron

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 501
    • View Profile
Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2012, 09:40:08 PM »
Assuming you aren't looking for CS6 plugins, Capture One Pro has some good HDR tools. Here's a before and after of a typical "consumer" snapshot using on camera flash. Just spent a couple of minutes moving some sliders...no masks, no layers on this one.

« Last Edit: August 02, 2012, 09:52:29 PM by skitron »
5D3, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100L, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, Canon TC 1.4x III

CTJohn

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 184
    • View Profile
Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2012, 08:18:52 AM »
Better is relative and highly subjective
Best is using luminosity masks in photoshop
I've use Photomatix and have liked the results.  Do you know of any reference available how to do the luminosity masks in CS?  I'd love to try.  I assume it's still with bracketed images?
EOS 6D * EOS 7D * Powershot S110 * EF 24/105 f/4L * EF 70-300 f/4-5.6L * EF 100 f/2.8L Macro

MARKOE PHOTOE

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 161
  • A better box of crayons makes the job easier...
    • View Profile
    • http://www.markoe.smugmug.com
Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2012, 10:14:35 AM »
I think I've probably tried all of them I could find.  Did their trial subscriptions first to see if they were worth the time and $.
Photomatix Pro is top notch and very affordable compared to the others.   HDR Efex Pro is also a decent program which can work with one image.  Of course, you can work with one image in Adobe Camera Raw also but it takes a bit more time processing one, saving it, processing again, etc.
A few cameras and lenses and a lot of creative energy and imagination.

keithcooper

  • PowerShot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2012, 11:03:24 AM »
Although not a big user of HDR, I've recently written up a lengthy review of HDR Expose 2 and am in the process of writing up similar details for Nik HDR Efex 2

http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/reviews/software/hdrexpose2.html

tombu

  • PowerShot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2012, 12:09:28 PM »
Better is relative and highly subjective
Best is using luminosity masks in photoshop

I've use Photomatix and have liked the results.  Do you know of any reference available how to do the luminosity masks in CS?  I'd love to try.  I assume it's still with bracketed images?

Here is a great video, I learned the technique by watching this, but by using this method u can't remove ghosting  :(
manual hdr fusion.mp4 Small | Large

canon rumors FORUM

Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2012, 12:09:28 PM »

unfocused

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1762
    • View Profile
    • Unfocused: A photo website
Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #7 on: August 03, 2012, 01:23:24 PM »
Tombu,

Fantastic video. Thanks for sharing. Kind of disappointed though, I tried to go to the website for more and it looks like the author's domain has expired. Oh no!
« Last Edit: August 03, 2012, 01:27:42 PM by unfocused »
pictures sharp. life not so much. www.unfocusedmg.com

tombu

  • PowerShot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #8 on: August 03, 2012, 03:56:05 PM »
Oh, that is actually sad to hear, there was some really good stuff!

RendrLab

  • PowerShot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2012, 05:23:34 PM »
I recently went through the same series of questions myself. First of all, I have found no "HDR" software or plugins that can even come close to the capabilities of Luminosity Masking. I have used each and every one currently available and it seems that if you want quick\so-so results without the complications of Luminosity Masking, Photomatix does the best job. However, I HIGHLY recommend starting right here http://goodlight.us/writing/tutorials.html and going with the Luminosity Masking inside PS. You have so much more control of how every brightness/color level of your image is handled. Definitely a bit of a learning curve if you want spectacular results, but worth it weight in gold when you see the results. 

canon rumors FORUM

Re: HDR CS6 vs 3rd Party
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2012, 05:23:34 PM »