December 20, 2014, 07:05:36 PM

Author Topic: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots  (Read 28857 times)

Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1675
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« on: August 16, 2012, 02:59:00 AM »
So, I think I'll start a 5d3 in-camera HDR shots. Here are a few from today testing out the TS-E 24mm I'm borrowing through Canon CPS. Really cool lens, very interesting using it. Mostly was using Art Vivid, but I think the first one there is Natural.
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

canon rumors FORUM

Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« on: August 16, 2012, 02:59:00 AM »

Ricku

  • Canon 7D MK II
  • *****
  • Posts: 494
    • View Profile
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2012, 03:19:18 AM »
That's terrible! :D

Maybe in camera HDR will be good in 5D Mark 5 or 6, but right now it is truly useless.

Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1675
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2012, 03:22:19 AM »
Maybe this will be the new trend in HDR, find the crazies in-camera HDR that you can find and post it!

Personally, I actually found #3 to be the most interesting. The sorta pixelated & blurred is unique. Not something you'd really ever see if you HDR'd it properly.

EDIT: I also found #2 to be fairly nice. The crazy blur/plane of focus is due to the Tilt-Shift lens, not the HDR process. At least not mostly. I think I had a small bit of shift, maybe not, and a pretty good tilt after a 90 degree rotation.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2012, 03:34:14 AM by Drizzt321 »
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

spinworkxroy

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2012, 05:05:59 AM »
I actually find the 5d3 In camera HDR extremely useful for travel shots.
I recently went to several places by the beach (Santa Monica etc) and with the bright sunlight, and the location of the sun, i had many shots that have the people underexposed because of shooting into the sun.

On ideal shoots, you'll use an ND Filter or photoshop to recover shadows and highlights etc…but when travelling, i don't want to have to do any of that..i don't even shoot in RAW..i want everything as simple as can be.

This is where i find the HDR feature extremely useful. For shots that have too large a range from highlights to shadows, i just use the in camera HDR and it solves almost EVERYTHING…i rather have an image where i can see everything but look "fake" than have an image that have underexposed areas especially family faces that you can't see.

here's an example of how the HDR helped…without it, the building would've been so dark you won't see it clearly at all. This is just one example..i've use the HDR ALOT during my trip since it was much easier than struggling with filters and locking exposures and taking multiple shots etc…HDR is a quick fix for normal generic shooting.



tomscott

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 652
  • Graphic Designer & Photographer
    • View Profile
    • Tom Scott | Photography
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2012, 07:47:41 AM »
No sorry not for me, they would have been much nicer processed properly but I dislike HDR anyway.
5D MKIII 40D 17-55mm F2.8 IS 16-35mm F2.8 II L 24-70mm F2.8 L 24-105mm F4 IS L 100mm F2.8 IS L 70-200mm F2.8 IS II L 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS L 50mm F1.8 2x Ex 580EX

DB

  • Guest
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2012, 09:56:45 AM »
For some reason they all look very blurry. Perhaps it might be a good idea to put the camera on a tripod, then test in-camera HDR versus multiple bracketed exposures of the same composition, that are then processed in PS or Photomatix etc.

romanr74

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #6 on: August 16, 2012, 10:37:14 AM »
not for me neither...
EOS 5D Mark III; EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, EF 16-35 f/2.8L II, TS-E 17 f/4.0L, EF 24-70 f/2.8L II, EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Macro EF 100 f/2.8L IS

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #6 on: August 16, 2012, 10:37:14 AM »

Viggo

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 2138
    • View Profile
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #7 on: August 16, 2012, 10:42:56 AM »
I found the "natural" setting to be most to my liking, but it didn't do much, other than make a normal metered image duller.

I trust in Photomatix and a natural look to expand DR, not to see it like I am aón acid.

The TS lenses on the other hand are wonderful. I'm trying to sell my 17mm, but impossible to get rid of! People just don't get how great it is I think. Tons of 14 L II's going away the moment the add is placed.....
1dx, 24-70 L II, 50 Art, 200 f2.0 L

K-amps

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1539
  • Whatever looks great !
    • View Profile
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #8 on: August 16, 2012, 10:55:29 AM »
That's terrible! :D

Maybe in camera HDR will be good in 5D Mark 5 or 6, but right now it is truly useless.

It has it's uses. I think it does a pretty good job of removing ghosting for an in camera operation, however I find the need to PP them in LR or CS5 later on to look their best. One thing I always need to do it increase contrast and reduce saturation.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2012, 10:57:55 AM by K-amps »
EOS-5D Mk.iii 
Sigma 24-105mm F4 ART; EF 70-200 F/2.8L Mk.II; EF 85mm L F/1.2 Mk. II; EF 100mm L F/2.8 IS Macro, 50mm F/1.8ii;  TC's 2x Mk.iii; 1.4x Mk.iii

spinworkxroy

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #9 on: August 16, 2012, 10:58:00 AM »
I'm not a fan of HDR and i agree that true HDR is best done PP.
However like i mentioned, for quick general shooting especially during vacations where you take hundreds of photos and don't want to spend you nights in the hotel room doing PP, the in camera HDR does work sometimes when you don't have the luxury time to do trial and error.
in fact, as much as possible, i don't want to carry around a big bag with all my filters and tripods etc..i just carry the camera and 1 lens so in a situation like the one i posted above where i was shooting into the sun directly, without the HDR, this photo would never have worked.
You might say i'm facing the wrong direction, shooting in the wrong time of the day etc..but it is what it is..i was there at that time and i was shooting that position..just imagine a person standing there..without HDR, you will never be able to correctly expose him.

I'm not sure what Canon had in mind when they included this feature int he camera but i'm sure glad they did…Althougth i's only use it 1% of my shots…at least it's there to save the shots that otherwise will not be captured properly

Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1675
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2012, 12:10:48 PM »
For some reason they all look very blurry. Perhaps it might be a good idea to put the camera on a tripod, then test in-camera HDR versus multiple bracketed exposures of the same composition, that are then processed in PS or Photomatix etc.

All shots were done on a tripod. You'll notice I was playing with the TS-E 24mm Tilt-Shift lens, which allows selective focus and moving around the plane of focus and other tricks like that. There's also quite a bit of movement in one or two of those shots, which combined with a slower shutter speed would make parts of it blurry.

I found the "natural" setting to be most to my liking, but it didn't do much, other than make a normal metered image duller.

I trust in Photomatix and a natural look to expand DR, not to see it like I am aón acid.

The TS lenses on the other hand are wonderful. I'm trying to sell my 17mm, but impossible to get rid of! People just don't get how great it is I think. Tons of 14 L II's going away the moment the add is placed.....

I agree, I find the natural setting generally gives better HDR images, but it comes out much duller and flatter than a plain old image. I was using the Art Vivid to "pop" the colors, although in some (well, most) cases it went a bit overboard.

Hmmmm...how much are you looking to part with the 17mm? Probably more than I can pay right now, especially since there's only a small amount of stuff I'd use it on. Ah well, I can dream, right?
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

blaydese

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 194
    • View Profile
    • Mr. Blaydes Photography
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #11 on: August 17, 2012, 04:32:56 AM »
Very nice stuff, I enjoy the enthusiastic effects you've produced and glad to see someone suing the in camera HDR effect.  Canon put it there for a reason.

Keep up the great work !

Peace! 8) 

Rienzphotoz

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 3326
  • Peace unto all ye Canon, Nikon & Sony shooters
    • View Profile
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2012, 08:56:30 PM »
Very nice stuff, I enjoy the enthusiastic effects you've produced and glad to see someone suing the in camera HDR effect.  Canon put it there for a reason.

Keep up the great work !

Peace! 8)
I totally agree ... forget the nay sayers, you cannot please everyone ... I liked the pics and I'm sure many people will like them as well.
Canon 5DMK3 70D | Nikon D610 | Sony a7 a6000 | RX100M3 | 16-35/2.8LII | 70-200/2.8LISII | 100/2.8LIS | 100-400LIS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.4 | 85/1.8 | 600EX-RTx2 | ST-E3-RT | 24/3.5 T-S | 10-18/4 OSS 16-50 | 24-70/4OSS | 55/1.8 | 55-210 OSS | 70-200/4 OSS | 28-300VR | HVL-F43M | GoPro Black 3+ & DJI Phantom

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2012, 08:56:30 PM »

pierceography

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 230
    • View Profile
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2012, 06:23:50 PM »
#3 is a great shot.  I'm not sure if that's ghosting in the ferris wheel or just how it lit up, but either way it's a nice effect!

I'll probably never use in-camera HDR.  It's a point and shoot gimmick that found its way into SLRs.  I do like HDR, and it certainly has its uses... but the shot needs to be properly processed, and there's just no way to do this with the camera taking wild stabs at what it thinks the best exposure/values should be for HDR.

If I ever need to get a quick HDR shot in the field, I'll just use my iPhone + app.  Results will be MUCH better, given that you control them.  Otherwise, it's bracketing and PP HDR for me.
5D mark III, 7D, Sigma 12-24mm II, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II, 24-70mm f/2.8L II, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 85mm f/1.2L II, 100mm f/2.8L, 135mm f/2L, 2x TC III

Rienzphotoz

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 3326
  • Peace unto all ye Canon, Nikon & Sony shooters
    • View Profile
Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #14 on: January 12, 2013, 11:22:31 PM »
Sunset in Goa - India
Canon 5DMK3 70D | Nikon D610 | Sony a7 a6000 | RX100M3 | 16-35/2.8LII | 70-200/2.8LISII | 100/2.8LIS | 100-400LIS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.4 | 85/1.8 | 600EX-RTx2 | ST-E3-RT | 24/3.5 T-S | 10-18/4 OSS 16-50 | 24-70/4OSS | 55/1.8 | 55-210 OSS | 70-200/4 OSS | 28-300VR | HVL-F43M | GoPro Black 3+ & DJI Phantom

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Canon 5D mark 3 in-camera HDR shots
« Reply #14 on: January 12, 2013, 11:22:31 PM »