Apparently sarcasm is not translated too well in the written form... Sorry bout that.
My comment was that Canon makes these 25,000$ lenses compatible with APS-C (And not APS-H/FF). Why? As most of you (and me) wonders: Why on earth would someone buy a APS-C body (7D as the most expensive is 1000-1500$) and put one of these lenses on it? Why not make it compatible with FF? A 5D3 with one of these on would be much more probable as a "bonus" market than an APS-C with this on. (Although I strongly doubt they had any "bonus" market in mind when making these).
I fully understand that these lenses are for professional use in the video industry. The problem is that when Canon makes these lenses APS-C compatible (and especially market them as such), it does not seem fully clear that THEY understand it.
But sure, if I had the money to buy these lenses (and any of the "C" cameras) for producing video, I might "try it on" my 650D (if I had one of those).
Anyhow. These seem like fine lenses, but not in my price range...
BTW, I have never claimed Canon are crazy or stupid. On the contrary, they are obviously a successful company, and they would not be that if they were either of those things.
Ps. I think I need more smileys, so I don't come across as a troll. Ds.