Quote from: JoeDavid on September 04, 2012, 07:24:06 AMAnybody else notice the complete lack of EXIF data on the images? Are they really from a 1D X. I haven't seen anything come out of my 1D X looking like that and I too own a 50/1.2L...I did notice the largest images posted are significantly smaller than the 1D X's s-raw-size of 2592x1728. I'm assuming resampling here, which probably caused the moire. Without knowing which software was used to what extent, can't say I'm suspecting the camera or the lens of the eerily discrete 'ghosting' area either. And about the flare: that would be flare. If all flare would be controlled, we wouldn't have enough UFO sightings
Anybody else notice the complete lack of EXIF data on the images? Are they really from a 1D X. I haven't seen anything come out of my 1D X looking like that and I too own a 50/1.2L...
Quote from: JoeDavid on September 04, 2012, 07:24:06 AMAnybody else notice the complete lack of EXIF data on the images? Are they really from a 1D X. I haven't seen anything come out of my 1D X looking like that and I too own a 50/1.2L...Yes they are indeed from a 1dx. For some reason the metadata is not transferring to flickr. Just so there's no questions about the authenticity I'm posting a couple of screenshots from lightroom 4.1 with the metadata. I must admit I'm pretty shocked by this happening. The 50 f/1.2 is not producing this effect on my other bodies. It is a new lens, perhaps it is the combo of lens and body. I did know going into the purchase that the lens did have a reputation for strange and often annoying "behavior" but these happenings are a little bit more than I expected. I suspect that the problem could be with a faulty anti-aliasing filter. I'm going to attempt to return the body to the local dealer I bought it from 15 days ago. Hopefully they'll take it.I'm a little miffed with Canon's track record as of late. Seems the last few bodies I've bought have had problems out of the box. It's a real shame.