If the 6D turns out to have IQ closer(meaning more than 50% from the MK2) to the MK3 with good ISO up to 6400 and the AF system turns out to be fast and accurate with low AF, do you think it would be worth upgrading over the 7D?
I ask because I bought the 7D in May anticipating an entry-level FF camera by year's end. Unfortunately, like everyone else, I was a bit disappointed. After soaking in all the info over the past two days, my thoughts are:
- wifi and gps seems to be a gimmick and will be mostly useless after a few months
- If the IQ is great(KR seems to think it's almost as good as the MK3), this would make it much more worthy
- Hopefully the AF system is new and improved.
- My one big complaint about the 7D is the poor ISO, even at 400. Too much noise. If the 6D can perform good with 6400 ISO that would beat out the MK2, this would be a very strong selling point for me. I literally use NR on almost every image, even down to ISO 200.
Anyhoo, just wanted to see if people think I'm off my rocker or something else?