October 22, 2014, 10:09:19 AM

Author Topic: 6D or 5D Mk II  (Read 60419 times)

Andy_Hodapp

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 143
    • View Profile
    • Andy Hodapp
Re: 6D or 5D Mk II
« Reply #120 on: March 03, 2013, 12:03:56 AM »
Go to Ken Rockwell's site for definitve info on all these. I will get the 6D based on his input, my first digital after a long velvia/zeiss marriage. Ken  was in the industry developing hardware and software for color digital, and now is a full time reviewer. If its not good enough, he tells us, if its superior, you get to know.

I really hope you are trolling or kidding.
Canon 5D MKII, Canon 17-40mm F/4L, Canon 50mm 1.8 II, Helios 44M-4 58mm F/2, Sigma 105mm EX DG Macro F/2.8, Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD, Canon 200mm F/2.8L, Yongnuo YN-560 II, S100 with underwater housing

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 6D or 5D Mk II
« Reply #120 on: March 03, 2013, 12:03:56 AM »

Marsu42

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 4813
  • ML-66d / 100L / 70-300L / 17-40L / 600rts
    • View Profile
    • 6D positive spec list
Re: 6D or 5D Mk II
« Reply #121 on: March 03, 2013, 03:56:47 AM »
If its not good enough, he tells us, if its superior, you get to know.
I really hope you are trolling or kidding.

KR certainly has the ability - for good or worse - to convey his personal mid-range amateur preferences as a definite opinion, and for people (re)entering the dslr market imho that's at least better advice than the usual "just get expensive gear, you'll get sparkling(tm) shots" often found in stores.

Btw what the poster above wrote is also KR's business concept - "help me help you" and make things (apparently) simpler - so no need to attack people who (currently) like KR.

canon rumors FORUM

Re: 6D or 5D Mk II
« Reply #121 on: March 03, 2013, 03:56:47 AM »