This review is unfortunately very incomplete. You can still see all the areas he hijacked the 5d mark 3 review to fill in ares/make comparisons. Not enough of the old info is out of it.
Also the first same shot had a 5d3 listed in its metadata. a pre production camera should have ts info within it, - right?
At the mid point it becomes hard to read this because there's too much 5d review info strewn about it.
He does make it at least sound like a better cam than the specs point to, but not convinced yet. the chromatic aberration in body fix would b a HUGE boon though. Also to his point ,the af cant b any WORSE than the 5d mark 2.