July 29, 2014, 06:23:50 PM

Poll

How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?

-2 or less
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4 (Ken's setting)
More than +4

Author Topic: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?  (Read 5757 times)

zim

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 670
    • View Profile
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2012, 02:00:45 PM »
where's the option for 'only in post and depends on the photo'  ;)

canon rumors FORUM

Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2012, 02:00:45 PM »

unadog

  • Canon AE-1
  • ***
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2012, 03:01:46 PM »
Your question is not well framed. You might want to try a new poll, as it looks like this one is just starting. Here is why.

Whether I shoot RAW or JPEG, I choose a PICTURE PROFILE/STYLE that already has less saturation.

Either in camera or in Lightroom, I pick a Picture Profile (Landscape/Portrait/Faithful/Natural/Etc.) Then I adjust teh saturation settiings in camera or post to reduce saturation.

I also shoot in AdobeRGB, not sRGB.

So THERE IS NO STANDARD "SATURATION BASELINE" to reduce from.  It depends one the profile and color space you are shooting in. There isn't a number that applies to all.

I shoot Marvel Cinestyle, Technicolor Cine or ProLost Flat.

http://prolost.com/blog/2012/4/10/prolost-flat.html

ProLost Flat starts with Natural, and then sets Saturation to -2.  So in a sense, -2, but that is much different than "Landscape -2 sRGB."

Sorry, I didn't mean to shout.  :P

I just wanted to emphaisze that there is no "Saturation" benchmark, like Greenwich Mean Time, that eberything can be compared to.

Cheers!
Michael 

ScottyP

  • 6D
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
    • View Profile
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2012, 03:44:26 PM »
Not sure what +1 or +4 in-camera translates into relative to LR, but as I know the common rap on Rockwell is oversaturation, I assume that+4 is pretty heavy. 
In LR I generally leave saturation alone and use vibrance instead, usually about +10 or 20 ticks.
Canon 6D; Canon Lenses: EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II; EF 24-105 f/4 L; EF 85 f/1.8; EF-S 17-55 f/2.8; Canon 1.4x Mk. III T.C.; Sigma Lens: 35mm f/1.4 "Art"

slinky

  • Power Shot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2012, 04:17:36 PM »
Not sure what +1 or +4 in-camera translates into relative to LR, but as I know the common rap on Rockwell is oversaturation, I assume that+4 is pretty heavy. 
In LR I generally leave saturation alone and use vibrance instead, usually about +10 or 20 ticks.

also around there.
Vibrance for photos with fleshtones present, saturation for those without.

Click

  • Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • *******
  • Posts: 2604
    • View Profile

Mt Spokane Photography

  • Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II
  • ********
  • Posts: 8272
    • View Profile
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2012, 04:35:24 PM »
Lots of Nikon users boost the saturation, Canon has more contrast by default, so it does not appear toneed more saturation.

pdirestajr

  • 5D Mark III
  • ******
  • Posts: 731
    • View Profile
    • flickr
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2012, 05:36:23 PM »
I only increase "vibrance" in post slightly (depending on scene). I find it a "smarter" saturation slider, in that it won't clip the already saturated parts of the image.
7D | 5DII | EOS-3 | Nikon F3 | Mamiya 645 Pro-TL

canon rumors FORUM

Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2012, 05:36:23 PM »

marekjoz

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 945
    • View Profile
    • marekjoz @flickr
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2012, 05:59:02 PM »
I know what you all mean saying, that the poll may be misleading or there is no simple answer. Anyway I still find your answers pretty useful:
1. Rather vibrance in Lightroom, not saturation
2. If anything, rather +1 than +4

It's still useful information for me and thank you for participating. What I find from your statements is, that you rather do not tend  to oversaturate photos, making them look more artificial, but sometimes more interesting. It's maybe easy to make fun of Ken, but it could occure, that in reality many of us oversaturate our photos.

I also understand, that there is no standard or baseline but the question in workflow is - how much time do you spend on each photo? Of course - no simple answer here, as it can be 30 seconds or 30 minutes. But I assume, that if you work on 100, 200 photos from an event, then you don't spend 30 minutes on each photo, but rather try to copy/paste settings used in one photo to others, which seem to be similar in their lighting conditions. As I shoot RAW only, I simply found out, that in DPP I tend to set Standard or Faithful style, and after having normalized brightness, contrast, shadows and highlights I always check if the photo could not be a little more saturated. But in Lightroom I also prefer to deal with vibrance.
If the photo doesn't require perspective correction I prefer anyway to use DPP because I think, that their DLO is better, than LR's Profile Correction.
flickr | youtube | 5D2, 50 F/1.4, 24-105 F/4 L IS, 300 F/4 L IS, x1.4 II

unadog

  • Canon AE-1
  • ***
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #23 on: September 23, 2012, 10:27:32 PM »
It's still useful information for me and thank you for participating.

I agree, it is useful.

When I shot film for scanning, I always shot a lower contrast, lower saturation color negative film. My favorite was Portra 160NC.

I found then and I still find now that you can always ADD contrast and saturation in post. Basically you are compressing the range and throwing away data.

You cannopt go in the opposite direction in post. If you reduce contrast or saturation (on a JPEG, etc) you get banding, because the data just is not there.

I also come from a fine art background. To me lower stauration & contrast lend themelves to a more complex, nuanced image.

Good luck!

Michael

CharlieB

  • Canon 70D
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #24 on: September 23, 2012, 11:04:59 PM »
I've found that what worked ok with my XTi was huge overkill for the 5DII, if that means anything.  I'd dial in a two clicks of saturation + on the XTi, but keep it "default" on the 5DII

K-amps

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1502
  • Whatever looks great !
    • View Profile
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #25 on: September 24, 2012, 08:35:40 AM »
With the 5Dc, I found myself boosting vibrance but not boosting saturation. With the 5diii, I don't feel this need, in fact sometimes need to -1 saturation.

I do however almost always increase blacks and/ or contrast; this has a byproduct of "virtually" boosting saturation in itself...
« Last Edit: September 24, 2012, 09:40:58 AM by K-amps »
EOS-5D Mk.iii 
Sigma 24-105mm F4 ART; EF 70-200 F/2.8L Mk.II; EF 100mm L F/2.8 IS Macro, 50mm F/1.8ii;  TC's 2x Mk.iii; 1.4x Mk.iii

Kernuak

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1108
    • View Profile
    • Avalon Light Photoart
Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2012, 04:07:29 PM »
For the majority of shots, I don't alter the saturation. However, for some sunset landscapes, I increase highlights saturation in Lightroom according to what individual shots need. As a general rule, I add a medium contrast curve in Photoshop (I know, it's sometimes a bit contrived the way I've developed my workflow, but it's the easiest way to get what I want without finding time to relearn a better method), which sometimes results in oversaturation, so for quite a few wildlife shots, I actually reduce saturation after applying the curves adjustment. In camera I have it set to the Standard setting, but I shoot in RAW anyway, although I have done my last few shoots in JPEG and RAW, as one recent shoot needed a quick turnaround at a press event and I haven't bothered to change it back.
Canon 5D MkIII, 7D, 300mm L IS f/2.8 and a few other L's

canon rumors FORUM

Re: How much saturation do you usually add/remove in your photos?
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2012, 04:07:29 PM »