So….my lens lineup got all jumbled and rearranged when I went from the 7D to the 5D3. I had this setup:
24-70 2.8 L
I now have:
17-35 Tamron (love it)
24-70 2.8 L
Funny how the two niches I am spending most of my time and actually making money from these days don't have lenses represented in that lineup.
I'm missing a low light prime (50/85/100)
Dedicated Macro (EF 100 2.8 or Tamron 90 SP Di 2.
It's hard for me to pick up a FL too close to the 40 because the 5D3 does so well in low light but I'd like something with more and better blades. The 85 1.8 vs 100 f/2 conundrum is swirling in my head as well as the Macro need and not wanting a redundant or similar FL with these two lenses. I've had a 85 before but that was with a T2i. Will I experience it in a different light? And I don't mean focal length but sharpness; center and corner, CA etc.
I've been using the 24-70 and 70-200 for portraiture (group/family outdoors)
and a Lensbaby Macro kit for …Macro.
Do you see the need for me to get a sub 2.8 lens? I WILL be getting a dedicated Macro but will it be fast enough for portraiture? I know it's sharp enough
Thanks in advance for your thoughts y'all.