April 17, 2014, 06:02:25 AM

Poll

Let's say a magic ginie arrives at your door, granting you 1 of 2 lenses.

canon 70-200mm f2.8 L II IS USM
60 (96.8%)
canon 70-300mm f4-5.6 L IS USM
2 (3.2%)

Total Members Voted: 62

Author Topic: Why would you get this lens?  (Read 3043 times)

Kevmeister!

  • Guest
Why would you get this lens?
« on: September 25, 2012, 04:37:59 PM »
let's assume you have non of these or any equivalent lenses. He will give you one, but only if you give him the reason why, which one would you choose?

(Sorry got a little bored trying to make this question interesting :P, basically which one would you choose if you would not look at the price and not asking me what I shoot the most, just tell which one would be more handy in what situation) 

canon rumors FORUM

Why would you get this lens?
« on: September 25, 2012, 04:37:59 PM »

Ewinter

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 221
    • View Profile
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2012, 04:42:43 PM »
70-200. Fast, accurate, razor sharp and enables the super sensitive 2.8 dual cross types to be used on any high end body. Also, lovely bokeh

Rockets95

  • PowerShot G1 X II
  • ***
  • Posts: 58
    • View Profile
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2012, 05:02:42 PM »
I'll take the 70-200 f/2.8 II, then I can get to 280mm or 400mm with Canon extenders. You can't do that with the 70-300mm.
7D, WFT-E5A, 70-200 F/2.8L IS II, 24-105 F/4.0L, 10-22 F/3.5-4.5, 580EX-II, Wife has: 5D2, 70-200 4.0L IS, 100 2.8L IS macro, 24-105 F/4.0L IS, 17-40 F/4.0L

Menace

  • 1D Mark IV
  • ******
  • Posts: 920
  • New Zealand
    • View Profile
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2012, 05:22:42 PM »
70-200 2.8 II :D

Fortunately I already have this lens - its fast AF, larger constant aperture and amazing IQ keeps it on my camera most of the time.

Cheers
5D III | 6D
50 1.2L | 85 1.2L II | 100 2.8 | 400 2.8L IS II 
24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

2n10

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
    • View Profile
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2012, 05:24:46 PM »
70-200 for pretty much the same reasons as everyone else.
Canon EOS 7D, EF-S 10-22, EF-S 17-55, EF 100 Macro, EF 50 1.4, EF 70-300, EF 100-400L

RLPhoto

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 3116
  • Gear doesn't matter, Just a Matter of Convenience.
    • View Profile
    • My Portfolio
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2012, 05:31:30 PM »
70-300mm is a lens I would have no use for, nor desire to have one.  :P
24LII - 50L - 135L
---------------------------------
www.RamonLperez.com

Kevmeister!

  • Guest
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2012, 06:19:45 PM »
Sweet, thanks everyone!! now to find that genie 

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2012, 06:19:45 PM »

daveheinzel

  • PowerShot G16
  • **
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
    • daveheinzel.com
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2012, 06:36:07 PM »
How come the 10-400 1.4L IS pancake isn't on the list? I'll take two.

Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1645
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2012, 06:36:25 PM »
70-200. Fast, accurate, razor sharp and enables the super sensitive 2.8 dual cross types to be used on any high end body. Also, lovely bokeh

Pretty much this, plus f/2.8 is very nice in the dark alley's where I like to shoot...errr...photograph stuff :P
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

neuroanatomist

  • CR GEEK
  • *******
  • Posts: 12749
    • View Profile
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2012, 07:25:54 PM »
Bad genie, that's a bad g'damn genie!!  First, you have to assess the victim's lamp polisher's needs. He may want the Ferrari, but if he has to haul his boat (that was going to be the second wish) over the dirt road to the lake, he needs the Land Rover.

The 70-200 II is a great general purpose zoom, excellent for portraits, sports, etc.  Perhaps less good as a travel lens. Also consider...do you need the extra 100mm? 

What body?  Personally, I found the 70-200 II to be an awkward focal length on APS-C - too long indoors, often not long enough outside.  On APS-C, the 70-300 L may be better for the reach. On FF, 70-200 is a great range.

One mor thing...if the genie can deliver the 70-200 II, he could also deliver the 70-300 L and $750 for something else...17-40L, 50/1.4 + 85/1.8, 600EX-RT, etc.
EOS 1D X, EOS M, and lots of lenses
______________________________
Flickr | TDP Profile/Gear List

viggen61

  • Rebel T5i
  • ****
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2012, 07:28:28 PM »
Everything published about the 70-200 f/2.8 IS USM II is peppered with superlatives. It may well be the best lens in the class. Add to that the availability of up to a 70-400 mm range, using the Canon III series extenders that the 70-300 cannot use, and it just can't be beat.

Sure, that's $3,500 in white Canon optics, but if the genie was giving me the lens...
« Last Edit: September 25, 2012, 07:31:46 PM by viggen61 »
Canon 7D

Videoshooter

  • Rebel SL1
  • ***
  • Posts: 85
    • View Profile
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2012, 07:28:47 PM »
70-200L IS II.

I can use extenders to go longer if needed.
5dmkII, 60D, 70-200mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, Sigma 150-500mm.

Drizzt321

  • 1D X
  • *******
  • Posts: 1645
    • View Profile
    • Aaron Baff Photography
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #12 on: September 25, 2012, 07:49:51 PM »
Bad genie, that's a bad g'damn genie!!  First, you have to assess the victim's lamp polisher's needs. He may want the Ferrari, but if he has to haul his boat (that was going to be the second wish) over the dirt road to the lake, he needs the Land Rover.

The 70-200 II is a great general purpose zoom, excellent for portraits, sports, etc.  Perhaps less good as a travel lens. Also consider...do you need the extra 100mm? 

What body?  Personally, I found the 70-200 II to be an awkward focal length on APS-C - too long indoors, often not long enough outside.  On APS-C, the 70-300 L may be better for the reach. On FF, 70-200 is a great range.

One mor thing...if the genie can deliver the 70-200 II, he could also deliver the 70-300 L and $750 for something else...17-40L, 50/1.4 + 85/1.8, 600EX-RT, etc.

The problem, in my opinion, is that said genie wasn't offering the 200L f/2.0 instead. Leaving aside the price, I suspect I'd go with that over even the 70-200L IS II, even though the 70-200 is a much better general purpose. There's just something about 200@2.0 (like the 135@2.0) that I'm really wanting badly.
5D mark 2, 5D mark 3, EF 17-40mm f/4L,  EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 135mm f/2L, EF 85mm f/1.8
Film Cameras: Mamiya RB67, RB-50, RB-180-C, RB-90-C, RB-50, Perkeo I folder, Mamiya Six Folder (Pre-WWII model)
http://www.aaronbaff.com

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #12 on: September 25, 2012, 07:49:51 PM »

iaind

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
    • View Profile
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2012, 04:30:10 PM »
Another vote for 70-200  as it takes extenders
5DIII + BGE11 / 5DII + BGE6 / 40D + BGE2N /8-15 4L / 17-35 2.8L / 24 3.5L TS-E / 24-105 4L IS /Zuiko 50 1.4/ 100 2.8L Macro IS / 70-200 2.8L / 300 4L / 100-400L

charlesa

  • EOS M2
  • ****
  • Posts: 305
  • I shoot with my eye!
    • View Profile
    • 15 stops to Heaven
Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2012, 04:37:35 PM »
Forgive me, but this one is a no-brainer!

canon rumors FORUM

Re: Why would you get this lens?
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2012, 04:37:35 PM »