We're told that Canon will announce a new and “unique” RF mount L macro lens alongside the high-megapixel EOS R camera sometime in early 2020.
The source wasn't sure what will make the new macro lens “unique”, but did say they were told that it would be faster than f/2.8.
In the past, we have heard that Canon is working on some kind of zoom macro, but we aren't sure if that'll be a feature in a new standard type zoom lens, or an actual 1:1 macro lens.
Note: The image for this article is the EF 100mm f/2.8L IS
Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
Do you mean tilt-shift? There are already 3 TS-E macro prime
Those only have 0.5x maximum magnification.
That reminded me of a thought I had.
Would it be feasible to make an EF-RF (or EF-M) adapter that had the tilt-shift mechanics in it?
If so, basically ANY EF/EF-S lens could become a tilt-shift lens on an R or M series camera.
Possibly, but TS lenses aren’t just normal lenses with a fancy mechanism. They have an extra large image circle in order to be able to fill the sensor even tilted/shifted. But an FF lens on an M body, or R body in crop mode, could work.
No, I mean tilt only. Combined with 1:1 macro that would be unique. From a purely macro perspective (pun intended), shift doesn’t offer much but tilt can be very useful. I suspect that by sticking to tilt, Canon could both allow higher max magnification and a greater degree of tilt (the latter would be important if the lens has a longer focal length, which I think is likely given that there’s already an RF 35mm macro).
PS
"Faster than f/2.8" seems to exclude a 180-200mm focal length, I'm afraid...
Yasuhara Nanoha Macro Lens 5:1 for Canon EF-M
Well, sort of unique because the linked lens has three LEDs not a ring and is 4-5X, not 1-5x.
So then, unique. Also, that's still for EF-M. Not RF. You'd have been better pulling up a link for Canon's 1-5x EF lens (which is fantastic and relatively cheap).
Thanks for the correction!
I have the MP-E 65. Not sure I’d actually want a ring light, too flat. The TwinLite does much better for adding depth to my shots (I had both MR and MT, didn’t keep the former).