Canon this past week announced the ST-E3-RT (Version 2) to not much fanfare. This comes ahead of the release of the new flagship flash, the Speedlite EL-1.
There has been no official announcement from Canon USA, but the new transmitter is available for preorder at US dealers.
Key Features
- Up to 5 groups or 15 Individual Flashes can be Controlled via 1 Transmitter
- Supports E-TTL II Flash, Manual Flash, Stroboscopic and Auto External Flash Metering
- 8 Types of Custom Functions, 3 Types of Personal Functions
- High-performance Hot Shoe Contacts for Reliable Information Transmission and Operation
- Channels: 1 Channels
- Connection Type: Hot Shoe
- Equipment Type: Transmitter
- Slave Type: Radio Slaves
Preorder: Canon ST-E3-RT Speedlite Transmitter, Version 2 $299
Press Release
Canon Europe today announces the ST-E3-RT(Ver.2) – an update of the popular ST-E3-RT transmitter. Enabling wireless flash synchronisation and multiple control of Speedlites – positioned up to 30m away – this new transmitter gives professionals greater creative freedom in both a studio and natural environment. It supports key features of the recently introduced Speedlite EL-1 and also enables new capabilities when using previously launched RT Speedlites – including wireless (radio) second-curtain synchronisationᶦ.
Other new features of the ST-E3-RT(Ver.2) include support for the Speedlite EL-1’s low-power 1/8192 micro flash, and for photographers who use manual flash, the transmitter boasts a new FE Memory mode.
High-quality, flexible capture
Through introducing radio wireless transmission and second-curtain synchronisation, the ST-E3-RT(Ver.2) releases the flash at the end of a long exposure. As a result, it helps photographers produce natural-looking images when capturing moving subjects. The ST-E3-RT(Ver.2) offers this feature as a new wireless option, giving users flexibility in a range of shooting scenarios.
When shooting with a large aperture and/or high ISO speed, the flash level can often overpower the subject and scene. This forces the photographer to change settings or set up, ultimately losing the look they desired. When partnered with the Speedlite EL-1iv, the transmitter’s 1/8192 micro flash adds beautifully subtle nuances of light without disrupting the atmosphere and ambient light reflected on set. This feature is perfect for fashion and portrait photographers looking to capture scenes with a natural atmosphere.
Building on the original transmitter’s flexible qualities, the ST-E3-RT(Ver.2) supports FE Memory – offering a quicker and more convenient manual flash set up. Alleviating the need for multiple test shots, professionals now have the option to perform an initial shot in E-TTL mode, capturing the E-TTL flash settings. Users can then switch the Speedlites to manual flash to allow for manual adjustments where needed – all whilst retaining the original E-TTL settings.
Maximising product life span
Canon Europe plans to offer a chargeable service update for existing ST-E3-RT users to include the new additional features and capabilities of the ST-E3-RT(Ver.2). Further information and dates of this service update will be announced later.
Oh well......
This seems like a strange restriction. I've have the Yongnuo knock-off for several years and it can do 2nd curtain with any model.
I had great performance and reliability from my 600ex RT's and ST-E3. I just needed more power. That's what lead me to trying out my studio Paul Buff lighting with their battery packs. The portability was terrible and clunky to say the least but it worked. I was able to go on site without cords. Then I went to the Godox system and that was a game changer for me.
I think that’s the crux of it right there... With Profoto at the high end and Godox taking the entry level, all the way up to Canon’s level of offering, I’m not surprised Canon isn’t working on fancy new products. Hard to compete with the Godox ecosystem.
and at 250 meters still gives me a firing rate of 80%......
Almost as if the original innovators have all left Canon. Did some bean-counter conclude that Yongnuo was just the first of a juggernaut of copycats that would undermine anything new? Did they look around and think there just wasn't enough profit margin with more powerful lights that could work seamlessly with EOS bodies, that there wasn't enough volume to compete in the portable studio-lighting sphere?
There has to be a sad, interesting story behind the current state of Canon's lighting business, though maybe it was never much to begin with. "Here are some flash for the top of your camera. See what you can do with them. What? Off camera? Oh bother. Alright, HERE. Now let us get back to bodies and lenses."
I'm not seeing that the new transmitter has added AF-assist. Would Canon be right to claim this is because they haven't been able to find something as discreet as infra-red that would still work for mirrorless AF systems?
I do know many amateurs grew to hate speedlights because of complexity, and because they slowed down the fun, and because the easiest way to use them was the worst way (blasting straight at the subject from the hot-shoe). And I know a lot of photographers who converted reluctance to learn (or lug around) into a distaste for "artificial" lighting, turning their incompetence into a virtue by brainwashing themselves into believing only available light was good light. Some of this attitude gets reinforced by the great improvements of digital cameras, of course. But I don't think Canon has done enough to educate their market about good light vs. mediocre or poor light.
Did Canon come to believe that the most lucrative segment of a shrinking market simply didn't care about lighting, and the smaller segment that did care didn't offer enough volume to overcome thin margins being challenged by copycats?
Can anybody point to some statistics which show how many photographers purchase more than one speedlight? Perhaps the great majority of photographers who use dedicated cameras see a flash as something like a tripod: "I thought I would need it, but I haven't taken it out of the closet since 1999."
In the current business world, will Canon try to regain some ground with lighting?
So you sound like Monty Python and “what have the Romans ever done for us”, apart from two or three of the best and most significant advances in lighting technology in the last 50 years, nothing.
Canon are not and have never seen themselves as a lighting company, there are other well established specialist companies that make any number of different lighting systems for all needs and budgets, they do and have always offered a decent range of sized and priced Speelites
For years I had nine 600RTs with battery packs and would gang them three to a softbox, but it was never satisfactory and extremely frustrating if you were shooting for any length of time. The way Canon has their strobes programmed, all the strobes in a group (A for example) will not fire if just one of the three is still recycling. So if you have a low battery in just one strobe you have to stop everything and either waste time figuring out which is slowing you down or switch out all the batteries. It would be so simple to offer an AC Adapter, add a battery level indicator and have the strobes that are recharged fire even if one in the group is still recycling.
Maybe they fixed these problems with the new model. But for me it's too late. The Flashpoints recycle almost immediately. The batteries hold their charge and with AC Adapters, you don't have to worry about battery life during long shoots. Plus, they actually cost less than what I invested in RTs over the years.
Canon's RT system itself was very reliable and I loved being able to set up everything from the camera's menu system, but the power issues were just too much of a hassle.
Just a mediation on where things stand today. Most readers here know of Canon's important contributions to the development of flash photography--but what signs do you see that more will follow? How long can a company, or a division of a company, sustain itself on past achievements?
What conversations would we be having now if Canon had just kept making incremental upgrades to dSLR's instead of going so deeply in on mirrorless? Are there any rumors of similar boldness with lights?
Harsh or not, it's Canon that will have to determine how to compete in a market where reverse-engineered--or even stolen--tech can be produced quickly in mass quantities. (I believe lighting is less complex and difficult to manufacture cheaply than today's camera bodies and lenses--but that too might quickly change. It would take a lot to convince me that Yongnuo and other such companies aren't backed by silent partners with very deep pockets.) Or Canon might decide to throw in the towel and tolerate dwindling sales of Speedlite systems that look run-of-the-mill and overpriced in 2021.