Constant Aperture APS-C Zoom on the Horizon? Canon Patents RF-S 18-50mm f/4 IS STM Optical Design

Craig Blair
3 Min Read

It looks like Canon is continuing its R&D into shrinking lenses as much as possible, we have seen multiple patents dealing with the size of lenses, and we’ve seen some small full-frame lenses over the last year such as the RF 28-70mm f/2.8L IS STM and RF 16-28mm f/2.8L IS STM.

It makes sense that Canon would bring similar constant aperture APS-C lenses of small stature. The interesting optical design in this patent is a Canon RF-S 18-50mm f/4 IS STM.

Overview

Problem

To provide a small-sized and lightweight positive lead type zoom lens.

Means for Solving

The zoom lens includes a positive first lens unit L1 that does not move during zooming, a negative second lens unit L2 that moves during zooming, and a subsequent lens unit including one or more lens units. The first lens unit includes four or less lenses.

A thickness on the optical axis from a surface closest to the object side to a surface closest to the image side of the second lens unit is denoted by D2, a sum of thicknesses on the optical axis from the surface closest to the object side to the surface closest to the image side of one or more lenses constituting the second lens unit is denoted by TG2, a focal distance at the telephoto end of the zoom lens is denoted by ft, and a focal distance of the second lens unit is denoted by f2. 3.1 ≤ D2/TG2 ≤ 10 and – 20.0 ≤ ft / f2 ≤ – 6.8 are satisfied.

Canon RF-S 18-50mm f/4 IS

  • Focal length: 18.54-52.02
  • F-number: 4.10
  • Half angle of view: 33.06-14.50
  • Image height: 13.66
  • Total length: 130.47
  • Back Focus: 14.72-14.72

Summary

An RF-S 18-50mm f/4 IS STM is the type of lens that we can see comping to the RF-S line-up of lenses. f/4 will keep it extremely small, and if you want f/2.8, you can go with the RF 16-28mm f/2.8L IS STM.

As always, just because the optical design appears, it doesn’t mean it will ever reach market, but this one makes sense.

Source: Japan Patent Office

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

Go to discussion...

Share This Article
Craig is the founder and editorial director for Canon Rumors. He has been writing about all things Canon for more than 17 years. When he's not writing, you can find him shooting professional basketball and travelling the world looking for the next wildlife adventure. The Canon EOS R1 is his camera of choice.

4 comments

  1. I'd rather like to see the rumored 16-60mm f2.8, than an even darker f4. Yes, it get's more compact, but Canon APS-C really needs more versitale and faster zooms, like the Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 and upcomming 17-40mm f1.8. And I hope that Canon will bring the EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 successor for RF with the R7 II later this year.
  2. 18-50mm/f4? A bit boring in my opinion, especially with 18mm as the widest. If I wanted that range, the already very compact and lightweight 290g Sigma 18-50/f2.8 would probably be more interesting. The Canon patent has IS, but at the short focal lengths I don't feel that makes much practical difference anyway.
    Canon, give us something to replace the EF-S 15-85mm instead. Something covering at least 15-70mm. That is the single most important RF-S lens we are still missing (and that's is objectively a fact ;)).
  3. 18-50mm is such a boring range, but the constant F/4 aperture can work. Hopefully they can create a new formula from 15-40mm or 13-33mm. If they make it F/4 and tiny, I would love it a lot. Or if they can do 18-50mm on full-frame, that would be beautiful
  4. This patent appears to be mainly about implementations of non-extending 70-200F4 for FF, with the APS-C 18-50 implementation being just an incidental output. The reason it's so long for what it does is because it is (amazingly enough) a derivative of a 70-400F4 lens layout. You can sense its telephoto origins in the convex front element: all standard zoom lenses I've ever seen use concave front elements.

    My take is that it is bloody unlikely that this 18-50 will ever come to light. A non-extending 70-200F4 is more likely, as that is clearly what they're trying to develop here.

Leave a comment

Please log in to your forum account to comment