Canon EOS Rumors

Current unreleased Canon gear from certification agencies

Canon Rumors
Posted onApr 16, 2019 at 2:05 PM
Updated onUpdated on Apr 16, 2019 at 2:07 PM

This site contains affiliate links to products and services. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Below are unreleased Canon cameras that have appeared at certification agencies. We expect the PowerShot G3 X Mark II and PowerShot G7 X Mark III to be amongst these cameras. There could also be a follow-up to the EOS M5 and the EOS M100 as well.

  • PC2355 – (Possibly the PowerShot G3 X Mark II)
    • Digital camera
    • made in Japan
    • Equipped with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.1
  • PC2358 – (Possibly the EOS M5 Replacement)
    • Digital camera
    • Equipped with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.1
    • Battery: LP-E17? (7.5 Wh)
  • PC 2366 – (Possibly the PowerShot G7 X Mark III)
    • Digital camera
    • Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.2 loading
    • Battery: NB-13L
    • See downloadable WM601 PDF for details on this camera
  • PC2367 – (Possibly the EOS M100 Replacement)
    • Digital camera
    • Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.2 loading
    • Battery: LP-E12 (7.2 V 875 mAh)
Canon Rumors
View thread (15 replies)
R

rrcphoto

EOS R6
Jun 20, 2013
2,505
147
C

crazyrunner33

EOS RP
Nov 4, 2011
308
127
Correct, the number which is the same as the 24.1 megapixel M50 in 4:3 mode. The medium and small sizes are also identical.

Edit: the .1 for 24.1 megapixel comes from the unused pixels(6012x4008 vs 6000x4000 in the final image)
 
W

Woody

EOS R
Jul 20, 2010
1,162
92
I am curious about the EOS-M5 MkII.

But will only upgrade if the improvements are substantial...
 
LSXPhotog

LSXPhotog

Automotive, Motorsports, Commerical, & Real Estate
CR Pro
Apr 2, 2015
617
688
www.diossiphotography.com
I would love to see a new M5 Mark II. I will probably pull the trigger on a refurbished M5 in the next few weeks if I don't know the future of the M5 Mark II.
 
R

Ryanite

Apr 17, 2019
3
0
Ah a shame it's LP-E17, was hoping for a larger LP-E6 aps-c mirrorless M mount since can isn't doing an aps-c R varient.

The small size just seems restrictive for a top end EOS M.
 
P

padam

EOS R
Aug 26, 2015
1,274
940
Ryanite said:
Ah a shame it's LP-E17, was hoping for a larger LP-E6 aps-c mirrorless M mount since can isn't doing an aps-c R varient.

The small size just seems restrictive for a top end EOS M.
Click to expand...
With the introduction of the EOS RP using the same battery, it doesn't make sense both in terms of size and extra cost. The original M5 body only MSRP was close to 1000$, maybe this time it might be a little lower, like 900$ or so.
One question mark is: will it keep the existing design or switch to a fully articulating screen?
 
H

Hector1970

EOS R
CR Pro
Mar 22, 2012
1,465
961
I haven't really considered buying an EOS M but its users seem to be very happy and it sells well in Japan.
I find it an oddity.
To me it felt like a stop gap until they had an EOS R APS-C version (which may never come now unless they do a 7D version). It's perhaps been more successful than Canon expected or planned for.
The EOS M has a nice range of lens but (I'm not sure about this bit) is not compatible currently with EOS R lens.
This has been one of the advantages of the EF system that all non EF-S lens worked on the APS-C camera.
I'm an Olympus user too and the lens are great but the micro 4/3 sensor can only be so good.
APS-C would have been in retrospect a much better sensor size for Olympus to build their system around.
I think if the EOS M was R lens compatible I'd be more open to buying one.
As it stands I wouldn't go down the route of having a M set of lens incompatible with other cameras.
Yes I could use EF lens with an adapter but it would I expect be quite unbalanced with L lens.
 
Q

Quarkcharmed

EOS R5
Feb 14, 2018
1,221
1,099
Australia
www.michaelborisenko.com
[QUOTE="Hector1970, post: 772382,
The EOS M has a nice range of lens but (I'm not sure about this bit) is not compatible currently with EOS R lens.
[/QUOTE]

Not compatible currently and will never be. Also M lenses will never fit the R mount. In theory an adapter is possible that has glass inside, but such an adapter will affect the quality badly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
B

blackcoffee17

EOS RP
Sep 17, 2014
792
1,040
Woody said:
I am curious about the EOS-M5 MkII.

But will only upgrade if the improvements are substantial...
Click to expand...

I really hope the M5 II will be something like a X-T3, a bit better built than the current M5.
It's disappointing they decided to use the same LP-E17 battery. Will be another camera with 200 shots
battery life.
 
B

BillB

EOS R
May 11, 2017
1,365
635
Hector1970 said:
I haven't really considered buying an EOS M but its users seem to be very happy and it sells well in Japan.
I find it an oddity.
To me it felt like a stop gap until they had an EOS R APS-C version (which may never come now unless they do a 7D version). It's perhaps been more successful than Canon expected or planned for.
The EOS M has a nice range of lens but (I'm not sure about this bit) is not compatible currently with EOS R lens.
This has been one of the advantages of the EF system that all non EF-S lens worked on the APS-C camera.
I'm an Olympus user too and the lens are great but the micro 4/3 sensor can only be so good.
APS-C would have been in retrospect a much better sensor size for Olympus to build their system around.
I think if the EOS M was R lens compatible I'd be more open to buying one.
As it stands I wouldn't go down the route of having a M set of lens incompatible with other cameras.
Yes I could use EF lens with an adapter but it would I expect be quite unbalanced with L lens.
Click to expand...
Canon seems to have made a clear choice not to have lens compatibility between the M and the R systems. The M lenses are relatively inexpensive and slow, a sign that price plays a big role in Canon's thinking about the M line.
 
W

Woody

EOS R
Jul 20, 2010
1,162
92
BillB said:
Canon seems to have made a clear choice not to have lens compatibility between the M and the R systems. The M lenses are relatively inexpensive and slow, a sign that price plays a big role in Canon's thinking about the M line.
Click to expand...

They offer the 32mm f/1.4 and 22mm f/2.... So lens speed is not necessarily slow.

Rather, I will describe M lenses as small, lightweight and relatively inexpensive.

If Canon comes up with a RF-mount APS-C camera, the lenses will be larger and more expensive. They'll lose customers like me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Canon Rumors Guy
  • Contains 1 staff post(s)
Here is an updated list of unreleased Canon gear from certification agencies
Replies
35
Views
19K
caffetin
C
Canon Rumors Guy
  • Contains 1 staff post(s)
An unreleased Canon camera appears for certification.
Replies
20
Views
18K
SteveC
S
H. Jones
New images and info regarding EOS R3 pops up on Canon USA website
Replies
14
Views
3K
Mikehit
M
Canon Rumors Guy
  • Contains 2 staff post(s)
Here’s an updated list of unreleased Canon gear
Replies
20
Views
21K
Jack Douglas
Jack Douglas
Canon Rumors Guy
  • Contains 1 staff post(s)
Here is a short list of unreleased Canon gear from certification agencies
Replies
20
Views
19K
RayValdez360
RayValdez360

Related posts