-
UPDATE
The forum will be moving to a new domain in the near future (canonrumorsforum.com). I have turned off "read-only", but I will only leave the two forum nodes you see active for the time being. I don't know at this time how quickly the change will happen, but that will move at a good pace I am sure. ------------------------------------------------------------
Latest activity
AlanF replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
Another post you missed...
AlanF replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
You have missed the crucial point in @Chig's post that he is comparing a 800mm on a 24 Mpx sensor with a Sony 600mm on a 50 mpx sensor -...
M
mimbu replied to the thread Viltrox to Release the AF 56mm F1.2 Pro for Everyone but Us.
Canon has never been friendly to 3rd party glass, I don't find it surprising that they doubled-down on this with RF. I also don't expect...
M
mimbu replied to the thread Viltrox to Release the AF 56mm F1.2 Pro for Everyone but Us.
Yes, when you have a 50/1.2, why would you ever want other lenses? You don't need a 35/1.2. You don't need a 135/1.4. You certainly...
M
mimbu replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
Yes, that is what would be expected to happen when the 200-800 doesn't add any additional resolving power beyond about 640mm. You get a...
H
HS2020 replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
This is really fantastic but could you post the before image as well for my curiosity. Because so much processing goes into making the...
B
Bob Howland replied to the thread Canon EOS R7 Mark II is Reportedly in the Wild.
Please, reduce/eliminate the rolling electronic shutter, please!
AlanF replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
As an extra - here is an animated gif of a Common Tern feeding its chick at about 300m away, below where the White-winged tern is...
R
rombe3jr replied to the thread Viltrox to Release the AF 56mm F1.2 Pro for Everyone but Us.
2025 is fading fast and the number of new RF & RF-S lenses is very low. Each new third party lens announcement is a dagger to the heart...
EricN replied to the thread Quick comparison of RF 100-500mm vs RF 100-300 and 70-200 f/2.8 Z + 2xTC vs EF 600mm f/4 iii vs RF 200-800mm.
Then again, if it was a white flying unicorn, f11 is probably ok!
AlanF replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
I have posted several threads on the RF 200-800mm, and several others have come in with more images. The facts are that the lens is tack...
T
ThomasTH replied to the thread Not so small Mammals.
I can only agree with that. Very nice photos.
S
scyrene replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
I do not recognise this analysis. What is wrong with the R6? They have more super telephoto options at a wider range of prices than when...
S
scyrene replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
Precisely this!!
S
scyrene replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
Nikon had to try and woo people precisely because it had lost so much market share. I don't happen to agree Canon is "lazy" in lens...
Filter
Forum statistics
Gallery statistics
- Categories
- 1
- Albums
- 29
- Uploaded media
- 353
- Embedded media
- 1
- Comments
- 25
- Disk usage
- 982.4 MB