-
UPDATE
The forum will be moving to a new domain in the near future (canonrumorsforum.com). I have turned off "read-only", but I will only leave the two forum nodes you see active for the time being. I don't know at this time how quickly the change will happen, but that will move at a good pace I am sure. ------------------------------------------------------------
Latest activity
Zadak replied to the thread Sigma formally announces the Sigma 200mm f/2 DG OS Sports.
I am starting to lose faith in Canon TBH, shouldn't have invested in the R5 MII.
Canon is playing it too safe and too expensive for...
Ozarker replied to the thread Canon RF 85mm f/1.4L VCM on the Way.
Bill installed your chip? Dang! I got mine on clearance at Walmart. Now the door alarms beep when I walk through and there's a short...
G
Greggr replied to the thread Viltrox to Release the AF 56mm F1.2 Pro for Everyone but Us.
we have canon ef 501.2, we have canon rf 501.2... we don't need some unknown lenses that just degrade the picture... even they cost...
A
Avulus replied to the thread Not so small Mammals.
Thank You Click
P-visie replied to the thread Canon RF 85mm f/1.4L VCM on the Way.
I guess “don’t get access to 3rd. party” lenses was ordained by the goddess Kwanon in something similar to the 10 commandments. “Only...
Click replied to the thread Not so small Mammals.
Very nice series, Avulus.
A
Avulus replied to the thread Not so small Mammals.
Here are few shots from last weekend using R5II+RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Z lens. The lens is really marvellous even with 1,4x and 2,0x...
D
Del Paso replied to the thread Canon RF 85mm f/1.4L VCM on the Way.
Yes, and this is the true reason why we don't get access to all the harmless 3rd. party lenses!
QAnon warned us, but no one listened!
P-visie replied to the thread Canon RF 85mm f/1.4L VCM on the Way.
That’s quite a change from “Canon is doomed” :ROFLMAO:. If you have read it on the Internet, it must be true.
P-visie replied to the thread Canon RF 85mm f/1.4L VCM on the Way.
I think multiple types of ‘AF motor’ will coexist, depending on the type of lens, size of the lens elements that need to be moved, costs...
snapshot replied to the thread Autofocus Stress Test: Can Canon’s Dual Pixel AF II.
i have found R52 auto focus in tennis from the back fence to be very good, faces are identified at 90 ft / 200mm focal length. tracking...
D
Del Paso replied to the thread Canon RF 85mm f/1.4L VCM on the Way.
We are doomed! Canon :devilish: is killing us!
As if the control chips Bill Gates implanted us and the deadly mRNA vaccines weren't...
B
Besisika replied to the thread Viltrox to Release the AF 56mm F1.2 Pro for Everyone but Us.
Some of EF lenses adapted to the RF have some issues as they were optimized for EF bodies. If the lens is optimized to be used with an...
D
Del Paso replied to the thread Quick comparison of RF 100-500mm vs RF 100-300 and 70-200 f/2.8 Z + 2xTC vs EF 600mm f/4 iii vs RF 200-800mm.
No worries, I only take pictures of unicorns sitting on branches, and never UIF. :sneaky:
But this 70-200 Z is murderously tempting...
D
Del Paso replied to the thread Quick comparison of RF 100-500mm vs RF 100-300 and 70-200 f/2.8 Z + 2xTC vs EF 600mm f/4 iii vs RF 200-800mm.
If you do not often need the 100mm extra reach of the 100-500, this seems to be an ideal choice. You could maybe complete the set...
Chig replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
I disagree, my friend has the Sony A1 and the excellent Sony 200-600 and he gets pretty much identical image quality to me with my R6ii...
Lynxtracker replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
Canon really needs to step up in this segment. A 300–600 mm f5.6 sounds very promising, but at what price? Sony and Nikon already offer...
T
ThomasTH replied to the thread Quick comparison of RF 100-500mm vs RF 100-300 and 70-200 f/2.8 Z + 2xTC vs EF 600mm f/4 iii vs RF 200-800mm.
Thank you for the tip about the 100–400mm lens, but I plan to use it for portrait photography, so I definitely want the 70–200mm f/2.8...
A
Adrianf replied to the thread Canon RF 300-600mm f/5.6L IS USM, Here We Go Again.
99% of my shots with my 100-500mm are taken at 500mm. Please Mr Canon, can I have a 500mm F5.6 or even 600mm F5.6 lightweight prime...
M
mimbu replied to the thread Viltrox to Release the AF 56mm F1.2 Pro for Everyone but Us.
Viltrox, Samyang, and according to Viltrox, "others".
Laowa for example only offers RF lenses with manual focus. The Laowa full frame...
AlanF replied to the thread Quick comparison of RF 100-500mm vs RF 100-300 and 70-200 f/2.8 Z + 2xTC vs EF 600mm f/4 iii vs RF 200-800mm.
When it comes to plans, remember:
“the best-laid schemes o'mice an' men Gang aft agley.” Translated it means that the best laid plans of...
DhlcadR6 replied to the thread Viltrox to Release the AF 56mm F1.2 Pro for Everyone but Us.
Viltrox could have did what Yongnuo did, re-design the RF mount&did minimal advertising to avoid Canon's legal action
T
ThomasTH replied to the thread Quick comparison of RF 100-500mm vs RF 100-300 and 70-200 f/2.8 Z + 2xTC vs EF 600mm f/4 iii vs RF 200-800mm.
I don't have any RF tele lenses yet, but that's exactly what I'm planning to do. Now I have confirmation that it's a good plan, and that...
Filter
Forum statistics
Gallery statistics
- Categories
- 1
- Albums
- 29
- Uploaded media
- 353
- Embedded media
- 1
- Comments
- 25
- Disk usage
- 982.4 MB