What's this lens 80-150 f 2,8 ?
Probably meant to be Olympus 40-150mm f2.8 and he was using Olympus OM-D E-M1X .
Upvote
0
What's this lens 80-150 f 2,8 ?
I'm not excited but rather curious what this lens is )80-150mm on FF is not going to get you that close to a tiger. Don't get too excited
I'm afraid it's the Olympus 40-150mm f:2.8 Pro (Equiv. to 80-300mm 2.8)80-150mm on FF is not going to get you that close to a tiger. Don't get too excited
Probably meant to be Olympus 40-150mm f2.8 and he was using Olympus OM-D E-M1X .
Full sensor readout at that rate is the bigger challenge.The 1Dx II used a Dual Digic 6+ processor. Canon have moved on two models later to a Digic 8...so if a Dual Digic 8+ then yes it's feasible. 1DxII 20.2*16 = 323 mp/s. A Dual Digic 7+ should be good for a 1.4x increase...so that's 452mp/s (28mp @ 16fps or 22.6 mp @ 20 fps). Using the same historical formula, a Dual Digic 8+ should be good for 1.4x that...633 mp/s...which is insane processing through put. 30 fps @ 21mp.
Lebs soeed
Full sensor readout at that rate is the bigger challenge.
Why?
New Mexico? Road Runners are a type of cuckoo.I'm more interested in where one can go to reliably get close shots of an adult cuckoo!
After getting people all spun up, I’m going to laugh really hard if he’s playing with a prototype Sony a9ii.
I think nobody would like this, but maybe is an Olympus OM-D E-M1X
I’m not sure why. Pixel count maybe?
Oversampled video on cameras such as Panasonic and Sony have just as many pixels, and they shoot at 30fps, some even at 60fps.
Some Sony cameras already shoot 24 fps stills with AF/AE tracking, even small point and shoots like the RX100V, and that is a few years old, it is not something special. I expect that the next generation processors will be even faster than that.
It's a Nikon DSLR or a Sony MILC.
Canon is far too conservative to let an ambassador market virally like this. They may prove me wrong, but there is a stronger history of Sony poaching wildlife professionals by buying their influence.