There should be at least a setting that allows eye focus to be active on a button press: Press the button, chose the AF point, release the button and look around as you like it ...
yep. "AF-ON" button / "back button focus"
Upvote
0
There should be at least a setting that allows eye focus to be active on a button press: Press the button, chose the AF point, release the button and look around as you like it ...
Everything is a guess at this point, so I don't see any problem with Neuro's probably educated guess. His statement makes perfect sense to me, but we'll see.Canon might do that. But, why would it?
At this moment, you added FUD to this discussion. We do not know what Canon will do. Nor do we have enough information about the tech to guess at what cameras would work with this technology.
Yup. My wife loves when I look and snap. No jealousy. She can appreciate the beauty as well as I.My wife: "Hun, this girl's booty is in focus. Well done!"
Everything is a guess at this point, so I don't see any problem with Neuro's probably educated guess. His statement makes perfect sense to me, but we'll see.
Neuro was pretty clear that he was guessing, and it seems a stretch to me to label a guess as FUD.Why tell someone that a wished for feature will not appear in a camera they want without relying upon evidence showing what the camera maker will do, will likely do, etc. It's one thing to speculate with like-minded individuals, it's another to spread FUD to people with a wish. My past exchanges wit him motivates me to refuse to give him the benefit of the doubt.
Exactly.Neuro was pretty clear that he was guessing, and it seems a stretch to me to label a guess as FUD.
Because he ususally knows what he's talking about and because his guess as good as your FUD assumptions. They make pills for those cramps. You shouild take one. Then maybe you'll feel more civil and not so... edgy.Why tell someone that a wished for feature will not appear in a camera they want without relying upon evidence showing what the camera maker will do, will likely do, etc. It's one thing to speculate with like-minded individuals, it's another to spread FUD to people with a wish. My past exchanges wit him motivates me to refuse to give him the benefit of the doubt.
If he was guessing, he should keep it to himself.Neuro was pretty clear that he was guessing, and it seems a stretch to me to label a guess as FUD.
Because he ususally knows what he's talking about and because his guess as good as your FUD assumptions. They make pills for those cramps. You shouild take one. Then maybe you'll feel more civil and not so... edgy.
Try reading what I said again, more carefully. The words are all pretty small, so if you go slow and follow along with your finger, I bet you can manage to comprehend it. I’ll even highlight the relevant bit for you.Why tell someone that a wished for feature will not appear in a camera they want...
Canon may reserve it for FF MILCs.
The mods didn’t see it that way when they deleted some of your posts from a past exchange. Or maybe that was because you were being too civil? LOL.And I'm civil to a fault. You do not see things that way?
Unfortunately for you, you don’t get to decide what I post. If you don’t like it, you’re free to ignore it. Of course, I don’t get to decide what you post, which means you’re also free to respond in a way that makes you look petulant and foolish...which is exactly what you did.If he was guessing, he should keep it to himself.
Blahhh haa, ha
Maybe the system in my EOS 3 isn't working properly. Another reason could be that the coatings of the glasses I wear interfere too much with the infrared light that the system uses to detect the eye positions. I don't know, I just read some comments on the web of glass wearers having the same problems with the EOS 3. But this is not too bad for me, I miss much more a joystick for the AF point selection, the "dial interface" used by the EOS 3 is a bit quirky. In fact, I both love and hate the EOS 3. I love it for its super precise metering system (ideal for slide film), good AF system (impressive, given the time this camera hit the market), huge selection of different settings, but I hate its non-intuitive interface and the loud motor winder (a real street photography killer).Sorry you had problems, as an eye glass wearer, getting it to work. I, also wear glasses and never had a problem calibrating it while wearing my eyewear. Don't know the reason for our different experiences but I had two EOS 3 and one Elan 7e bodies and the feature worked in all three for me. If they offer eye control focus in a future Canon body, perhaps, as you say, it will be much improved in the newer version.
That which is denied cannot be healed.
Try reading what I said again, more carefully. The words are all pretty small, so if you go slow and follow along with your finger, I bet you can manage to comprehend it. I’ll even highlight the relevant bit for you.
As for the why, well...reality. Or in the words of me ol’ Irish Da, “Wish in one hand, shit in the other, and see which fills up first.”
The mods didn’t see it that way when they deleted some of your posts from a past exchange. Or maybe that was because you were being too civil? LOL.
Unfortunately for you, you don’t get to decide what I post. If you don’t like it, you’re free to ignore it. Of course, I don’t get to decide what you post, which means you’re also free to respond in a way that makes you look petulant and foolish...which is exactly what you did.
You’re still saying, “Blahhh haa, ha,” and it hasn’t become any less moronic through repetition.Ah, a member in good standing of the Internet Tough Guy and Borderline Sociopath Association drops by to provide us with more strawman arguments, which is to say, BS.