We’ve received the pricing for the new RF lenses

Canon Rumors Guy

Canon EOS 40D
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
10,765
3,149
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
Next week, we’re obviously going to see both the Canon EOS 90D and Canon EOS M6 Mark II announcements. Along with the two new camera bodies, we should also see 2 more RF lenses officially announced this week. The RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM, RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM coming first and the RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM coming at a later date.
We have received pricing for the 3 mentioned lenses, but the pricing came to use in Thai Baht, so we’ve done a bit of converting to get what we think the USD pricing will be.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 82,600 THB – $2499 USD $2299
Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM 82,600 THB – $2499 USD $2299
Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM 93,500 THB – $2799 USD

The RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM and RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM are scheduled to begin shipping in October, while the RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited:
Sep 26, 2018
280
420
Ouch. So much for Canon continuing to have cheaper lenses than Sony and Nikon... I've been predicting much lower prices than this, but incorrectly it seems.

Although, the 24-70 2.8 price is only $200 more than the EF version 2 was at release, so this might just be the early adopter premium. (or the currency conversion isn't accurate)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
May 11, 2017
1,365
635
Ouch. So much for Canon continuing to have cheaper lenses than Sony and Nikon... I've been predicting much lower prices than this, but incorrectly it seems.

Although, the 24-70 2.8 price is only $200 more than the EF version 2 was at release, so this might just be the early adopter premium. (or the currency conversion isn't accurate)
Adjusted, for inflation, the RF prices may not be all that much higher than the introductory prices of their EF equivalents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
Upvote 0

bgoyette

CR Pro
Feb 6, 2015
121
73
Ouch. So much for Canon continuing to have cheaper lenses than Sony and Nikon... I've been predicting much lower prices than this, but incorrectly it seems.

Although, the 24-70 2.8 price is only $200 more than the EF version 2 was at release, so this might just be the early adopter premium. (or the currency conversion isn't accurate)
I'm forgetting, which EF 24-70 2.8L IS is it that you're comparing this to? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users
Upvote 0
so as Canon et al dont like to use conversion rates for the UK market but seem to like 1 pound = 1 dollar. Have been thinking of switching to mirrorless from the Canon 5D MKIII to reduce weight,sizes etc but after reading various articles on the weight of some of the RF lenses and now the pricing it certainly puts me off switching to mirrorless for quite a while
 
Upvote 0

Ozarker

Love, joy, and peace to all of good will.
CR Pro
Jan 28, 2015
5,933
4,336
The Ozarks
Adjusted, for inflation, the RF prices may not be all that much higher than the introductory prices of their EF equivalents.
Very true. Also, the EF versions were priced high at release just like the RF line. Prices will come down. There will be sales and rebates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

YuengLinger

Print the ones you love.
CR Pro
Dec 20, 2012
3,739
2,255
USA
I did not realize that country-to-country pricing was consistently linked. We in the USA often read on Canon Rumors about prices in Europe that seem much higher. Is that because of VAT in addition to Canon's price? Are prices really the same around the world? Or is Thailand a special case? (I've been to Thailand three times but never bought electronics.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

PureClassA

Canon since age 5. The A1
CR Pro
Aug 15, 2014
2,124
827
Mandeville, LA
Shields-Photography.com
If prices are correct, Canon is not exactly making it easy for ppl to switch to mirrorless. Isn't it like shooting your own foot ? Well, we won't have to wait long to find out.

It’s totally in line for L glass. But I hear you. Canon needs to get more non-L primes out for the RF mount asap. And Im sure they’re on it. But yes, going heavy on the L glass to start does make it difficult if you dont want to use and adapter
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

dtaylor

Canon 5Ds
Jul 26, 2011
1,805
1,433
About 10-15% higher than I thought. Still not terrible. Damn i want that 15-35. I may have to sell the 16-35 f4 and be without a wide on my EF gear....

The only one that kills me is the 24-70 IS. I love my EF 24-70 II but I do miss IS on it at times. The 15-35 will be a stellar lens but f/2.8 isn't worth the extra $$$ for me personally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0