rockwell says its sharp ,we will see. Maybe this forces canon do something equal or better :)
Or they may need improve their f2,8 and F4 400mm first ,before there is enough gap for sharper 100-400 or 400mm 5,6 segmentation..
I hope they sacrifice 400mm line some time and make new 400mm 5,6...
i wonder how they acquire copys they test? do they buy like all others or ask companys send one for test?
What i understanded they choose aperture what gives best shaprness ,and lens errors they put worst value or fully open value.
but i am not good to understand complex technical text :p...
yeah no enough room for big thumb,
I noticed my thumb is too long too, it naturally lands on mode wheel when it should to aperture wheel. i guess its planned to japanese hand.
oops forgot this is R not RP chain ,but just saying two similar adjust wheel is as bad as touch bar.
I believe its usual way sony and zeiss lenses. They need stopped down to be super sharp like they are. It makes them look good on dxomark tests.
oh woah RF 50mm got barely more score on their test than ef 50mm 1,8 stm :p Hard to trust revievs and tests ,everybody claims different.
Yeah it tries be 1dx2 with two battery grip and double buttons :) Its their 1 model.
i think lightness is one of crop cameras advantages . M and RP little battery is good enough for me .
Not so imposible thing to change battery after 200 shot or 2h .
They definitely need make light big flagship M camera for european male hands too. like 7d shaped but plastic camera without weather seal.
Canon could divide 7d line to two ,M camera like 7d but light , And Rugged R serie 7 for hard enviroment users.
Logic says sigma and tamron sells better . Its 1k cheaper .
Peoples who dont know much about photography surely thinks its lot better ,when 200mm more long than canon.
My earlier comment about pushing around 4kg heavy tube was half joke actually :P