Search results

Somehow I wonders why everyone reading is assuming some movable mount or sensor.. for the mounting possibility in the same physical mount, they just need to make the locking pins in the mount compatible for both, as how the EF-S can take both EF and EF-S lenses but EF-S would get obstruction in...

No surprise to me though, as someone who eagerly upgrade non L lens to L, from a 40D to 5D mk 3 and saw huge improvement in usable max aperture and ISO, that was what the multi grand budget brings for satisfaction, but since then nothing have improved in the way that tempts me from spending...

ok, I am tempted as a DSLR lover, and this might very well be the last flagship DSLR ever made so a part of collector item But (sneaking at my wife) I likely never can afford that:censored:

actually the DR is more than enough for most cameras in past 10-15 years to take even nightscape use, what borders is the banding when pushing shadow area, where it can be very disturbing for astrophotography use, and it seems in this gen canon sensor it's mostly solved.

Interesting adapter, from the MC11 seems generally ppl single focus acceptably with canon own EF lens, if it single focus ok with native canon lens I would love to give a try for the who know when it's coming foveon X3 camera alongside my old 5D3 for landscape.

I actually have similar question, back in the days 4/3 system claims they decide with the form factor because they can make light hit the sensor at right angle, so the shorter flange distance for mirrorless in theory would degrade the peripheral IQ. Micro lens modification might help improve...

I think able to look through the ovf when it’s off is a big advantage, beside battery life it’s also advantage that a dslr when switched to on without pressing button is basically not consuming power, but a mirrorless will always need to be turned off when not expected to be used in some time to...

I am just thinking about heat noise/ hotpixels, as using mirrorless always makes the camera hot or at least warm at extended use, I am thinking though no my significant it will result in more noise. But frankly speaking the new RF lens potential is attractive, it becomes a hard choice between...

Tried the R at some local camera store, the evf still feels disconnected to the reality maybe due to the artificial lighting that I see flickering with evf. And for low light performance I always believe with same sensor tech a dslr will always be better, as you don’t get the heat noise build...

That looks like a promising release but this might actually cure my gear acquisition syndrome, looking back at my completed gear set centered around an 5D mk iii it just don’t feel as tempting to sell it at a loss and the Re acquire the whole set in RF, recent trip to japan for some Sakura...

I just hope they can get me a 5D mk V with a sensor of better shadow noise which I once a while would prefer and that’s all I would want

it's easy to understand, as a gear geek myself haven't look or intend to upgrade my FF ever since I own my 5D mk III, the ISO, dynamic range and focus speed is already above what I need, and the FF view angle the same, as for lenses, I've owned my 70-200 F4L IS for 10 years and see no need to...

A bit off topic but I don’t get it why am actual 86mm lens will be named 90mm instead of 85?

To me personally except I hate evfs the R is actually good enough camera I will ever want or really need, that said since I got my 5D mk iii when it first release I never feel like to upgrade! But I don’t know is my eyes exceptionally good or what, in EVFs I always see it flickers especially in...

Exactly, it goes very slow at -29 C for three hours, and at that moment only the mirror slippers still works and the A7 in the team is basically unworkable

The new lens does looked impressive, but tbh personally the optical viewfinder can’t be replaced in some cases by full electronic ones, (in the field with very cold environment shooting northern lights, I had experience that after 3 hours the LCD of all cameras in the team got frozen and lags...

I am actually thinking as canon said in previous interview they have an interesting solution for EF Mount, why can’t they just go the G7x mk ii built in ND filter style, get an EF Mount with short flange distance, then if an EF lens is detected, an extra lens group will drop in to focus it onto...

I think of the really nice solution the other way round, why can’t canon just use the EF-m mount, but for some lenses that needs a shorter flange distance, make a simple notch on the mount end as inn the EF-s mount, whenever the new mount lens was screwed in, it just triggers it to protrude the...

Seems like to me using Ed mount in a fashion like the sigma milc is they way to go, mirrorless is kinda of about the instant peak on the exposed image and with more accurate AF, lack of mirror shaking etc. From Sony I would say except for ultrawide lens where short flange distance really have...

As a 12 years canon customer I have no objection the A7 series got me tempted too. But sony have always got some bugs and the reliability is more of a question to me as I used to take the expensive cameras to shoot auroras, or in mountains where weather might become harsh. I admit also that I...