Search results

Guys, do you have any observations on the 1D X and 1Ds files difference?

According to the feedback from service center particles are in the mirror box, not on the focusing screen.

The first image is very good. It's great to look at a bright emotion that fits very naturally in a shot :)

You should definitely look at the NEC PA272w.

It seems that D300 is AMD FirePro W7000 that supports 10-bit output: http://architosh.com/2013/10/the-mac-pro-so-whats-a-d300-d500-and-d700-anyway-we-have-answers/ I believe you can call Apple and ask whenever you decide to buy a Mac Pro. Though I feel that a Xeon processor is an overkill for...

From my point of view the most contrasty area on a scene attracts eyes. Here are sample pictures: If you want to add some art to you photography, you should try multiple exposures and glass reflections:

I have asked Canon service to check this theory while my camera is under warranty maintenance. The response was: "we don't comment forum posts". Is there another way to confirm these findings?

Hi Martin, Did you see anything like that black particle in your viewfinder? The reason I'm asking is that I got the speck in my camera, but it doesn't look like anything else I've seen before in my experience of careful treating. Best regards, Alex.

Anyone?

I've experienced the same kind of issue with my copy. The only difference is that I've got only one irritating speckle in the viewfinder which is always noticeable. It doesn't look like dust, but Canon-authorized service center wants to charge $250 to remove the speckle. Official response from...

Make your photos breathe, so you don't need to crop them later :)

My personal feeling is that you can achieve either magenta or yellow result with the left RAW file, but not the orange I have achieved with the right file. Do you want me to send you the RAW files over to play with? :)

P.S. I hope you have a good screen ;)

As I said before, it's not about calibration. It's all about how far you can go from your initial state. Below is a sample comparison (2 old images taken with 2 different high-end equipment sets): - left-hand side image is worse for me, because I cannot push the colors further than they are...

It seems we're still on different pages. I have mentioned "vision", because I see difference in the original file. I have attached an example. Let me attach a sample photo later :) It would be great if you could add sample photos too.

An off-topic question to you and everyone else. In the attached scheme the only place I can see for myself as a photographer is the one I have chosen (sitting on the aisle). What do you think about this location?

We definitely speak different languages. It seems that your vision and my vision are different. And even taking into account all you said, it doesn't work for me. I would pay twice for 10% win in initial IQ.

I should've been more specific when saying "professional" :) It seems I still cannot find a proper word to describe that kind of quality. I wanted to define somebody who's at the highest possible rung of every photography aspect. For example, I have experienced a lot of different shooting...

I understand this. But I don't feel that recognition and artwork are tightly connected. And again — this is how I feel, not what people would say. It seems there's a gap between two of us that makes understanding more complex. Let me exaggerate what I feel to make things clear: I don't like...

I'm a seasoned photographer. From my point of view images that don't have middle shadows (I have looked through their portfolio) do not conform the "semi-competent" workflow expected results ;)