Search results

Also because Canon has a lot of entry (plus entry+kitlens) DSLR's between 450 en 850 euro. Not so much for Nikon, Pentax.

It still is ;)

Maybe it sounds a bit boring, but I would really like my EF 100mm f/2 USM as an RF version. Small and light. No macro and no STM. Of course, at least the same optical quality as the EF version. Maybe less chromatic aberration.

Wonderful photos.

My bad. I agree about term 'much'. I find the 11-22 very small and light. But that's probably because I also have EF lenses. They are indeed much larger

@Dragon: "...OTOH, the EF-M 11-22 is a much larger and heavier lens than the RF-s 10-18, so the redesign may have been just a size and cost issue since small size is clearly a goal for RF-s lenses.... " Are you sure about that...

I really enjoyed these photos. I've been to the same cities over 20 years ago. If only I had the camera and lenses I have now. Although I did take quite a few photos with Kodak film.

Thank you Alan. One of the times when the woodpecker took a bath and was not nervous about a hunting bird. Glad I can show you something you haven't seen.

Thank you very much Click!

Thank you. The woodpecker thought he could take a private bath...unfortunately - lol

The great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) R6 & 100-400L II @ f/5.6 with 1/400 and 1000 ISO Some special light here. Even the woodpecker is surprised ;)

It makes sense if this lens is small and light and has a built-in 1.4 extender. Just my 2cents

O, I am not sure what happened. Ik took out the photo from this thread. But I believe it now can be seen in the thread of 'Post your best bird photos'. The link I put here goes to the start of that thread. Sorry for the mess.

Thank you very much Click!

European green woodpecker (Picus viridis) R6 & 100-400L II @ f/5.6 with 1/400 and 2500 ISO

Sorry wrong thread! :( I will move it

Not sure what caused the purple fringe on the left side. But 300 seconds seems a lot for creating a star trail and freeze the water in the foreground. Even when stacking. Did you try with less long exposuretime? What do you see?

MRSP in the Netherlands: €2.739

That's the first thing I thought about. The knobs and locks. The first time I used my TS-E 24mm f/3.5 II, I saw how fragile the knobs and locks are. When I use the lens I am constantly aware of it and turn carefully. That's the only thing you can do. But Canon can indeed make some improvements.

Of course it depends on the use of this lens. It cannot be compared to a top L lens. But you can certainly take beautiful photos with it. Here is an astro photo also set to infinity.