Search results

None of your business.

Times I have made Camera-related purchasing decisions based on rumors: 0 Times I have made Camera-related purchasing decisions based on price: every time

Maybe customer demand for the M6II is light due to the relative expense. As I said, the M6II is a significant price hike over the M6. It feels like Canon are experimenting with what the market for that form factor camera will tolerate in terms of price.

Just because something is unavailable doesn't mean it is discontinued. Given all of the supply chain and transport issues, this is probably THE worst time to make such a conclusion.

back at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, when there was no toilet paper on supermarket shelves, would you have said that toilet paper was discontinued? Not that it matters, but the M50-II and the M200 are still available. Maybe the M6-II just didn't sell well (and is EOL) beause it was too...

Easy test, visit Canon's Australian website: https://www.canon.com.au/mirrorless-cameras and you can find the M6 Mark II with a 'Buy' button. Doesn't look very discontinued to me.

People choosing EOS-M aren't doing so because they want big lenses with wide apertures.

EOS-M has a total combined package size that is the most friendly for those hiking long treks and those who don't want the burden of a large camera while tourist sight seeing. The RF-s replacement (11-55) is not going to be smaller than the EF-M 11-22 however I can see a lot of tourists wanting...

The lens options for Olympus aren't as good and the system is not price competitive.

That's what stitching is for.

To give an example of size ... you can fit 2 M6's in the space of 1 R10. Camera Length (mm) Width (mm) Depth (mm) Volume (mm3) Weight (g) R10 122.5 87.8 83.4 897,008.7 429 M6 112 68 44.5 338,912 390 M6 Mark II 119 70 49.5 465,349.5 361

EOS-M is not EOS XX0D.

Not unless the EOS-M market is significant enough in size. Will wait and see if Canon attempt to plug that hole in the market or just leave it, hoping for people to go for a bigger camera.

EOS-M was successful for a reason. The R7 & R10 do not capture that reason.

The Russian army use Canon Rebels in their drones.

Not going to give up the M6II with 11-22 anytime soon.

Don't forget the ad placements and revenue for CR.

Maybe the R7 will be rhe 7D/II but with the price corrected to leave room for a R70, R700, and not to forget R7000.

Which will be sad. EF-M has a size & form factor that RF/RF-S can't touch.

With an image height that is short of the full frame sensor, either Canon brings out a "small" full frame sensor (Canon's APS-C is smaller than Nikon's APS-C) or perhaps this lens is an RF-S lens...