Search results

DSLRs are tanking hard. That is why Canon are not doing anything more with them, the market for them is evaporating fast. In Japan they are down to ~21% of the ILC market, lol. http://www.cipa.jp/stats/documents/e/d-202007_e.pdf

What tight spaces are you referring to? Rabbit burrows? I have never had an issue getting a gimbal into spaces. IS is still nowhere near what a gimbal does. Like I said, it is intended to replace a tripod, not a gimbal. You can use it for walking and such, but it is still inferior to a gimbal...

People don't look at their cell phones sideways. If you are shooting content for cell phones, shoot it vertically.

Landscape mode looks really stupid on TikTok and cell phones in the way they are generally used, so if you are shooting like that for those devices, please stop.

No it is not. It performs a different function and fills a different use pattern. The C70 is still a very large camera, it is not a lot smaller than a C300. It also costs almost twice as much as a a7SIII. The Sony product it will compete against is the FX6 most likely.

Um...no...it does not. Camera IS is not intended to replace a gimbal and definitely does NOT perform anywhere remotely as well. It is intended to partially replace a TRIPOD in terms of its functionality.

That refers to stills application though, not video.

Except that the camera appears to have a grip, meaning that it can be used for run and gun shooting styles.

They are different cameras for different applications, so those comparisons will be for specific purposes. I think most people are probably going to be comparing the video modes though.

Supposedly it has a quad beyer sensor, so it is actually a 48MP sensor, but without that mode enabled apparently. So in theory it could rival the R5 for stills if they wanted it to. I imagine they would use the same sensor in something like the a7IV when that comes out.

IMO Canon can take some lessons from Sony in menu design. Canon menus are terrible and awkward to use, while Sony menus are second nature.

Raw is not compressed. The sensor supposedly going into the camera has a 16 bit ADC, so raw will be 16 bit.

No overheating, no pixel binning/line skipping, better S/N ratio from larger pixels etc. High resolution sensors are good for stills work, not so great for video work. The R5 is primarily a stills camera, the R6 a hybrid and the a7SIII will be primarily a video camera. So, depending on what...

Heat comes from compression efficiency, not bit rate as such, lmao. That is why earlier Canon cameras had such high bit rates in 4K modes, they had to use mjpeg to do the encoding because the processor would have fried if they tried to do it with H.264.

The a7SIII will likely cost about the same as the R5.

Nope. The 1900 mbps is for compressed raw recorded on the camera. The Sony raw will be recorded off camera, so the bit rate would be whatever you set the recorder at. The a7SIII will likely be a much better video camera than either the R5 or R6. Not so good for stills though, the R5 would be...

That would explain it then. Americans tend to get confused about geography sometimes :) You said the factory owner was in China and could not freely communicate because "big brother" was watching. Then you went on to say he is near Singapore. Singapore is a city state in Malaysia, nowhere near...

You know that Singapore is not in China or anywhere near China right?

No. This camera is a repackaged M50 and so has its capabilities. The G5X II and G7X III (along with the M6 II and 90D) are based on a new hardware image signal processing configuration which does not support 24p.

This camera is a M50 repackaged in a different form factor, that is all. The specs are pretty much the same.