Search results

Total Paparazzi, Law enforcement, and Military, and perhaps some scientific applications. This is where I see the bulk of sales for these lenses. And of course the few (100's? 1000's? ...maybe) well-heeled serious enthusiasts. And some pros - a few. For example, far safer to photograph Kodiak...

Just a note here on Canon refurbished gear purchased online from the CanonUSA.com website - these items, camera bodies and lenses anyway, come with the same 1-year warranty they put on their new stuff. So... there's that to think about. I have purchased in this way from them. Several years ago I...

I think another aspect to the disappointment with these lenses is the fantastical PRICES. As other's have already pointed out in other Forum threads, for the cost of the 1200mm one could buy an R3, the RF 600mm f/4, and an RF 1.4x tc, with some money left over for the piggy bank.

I agree with your analyses. I would add that it also gives Canon marketing "bragging" rights as their mirror-less line-up of lenses now has the longest-reach available. I would be surprised if Nikon doesn't either come out with a 800mm or 1000mm of their own. I don't necessarily think they would...

One thing I found quite amazing - beyond the stratospheric pricing - is that both lenses focus very close. Especially when one considers their telephoto length. The 1200mm focuses to 14.1 ft and the 800mm to like 8.3 ft. I have a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS (Mk I, first gen.) and at 200mm it only focuses...

Sounds like the TSE 24mm Mk II has better light transmission?

Well it sounds like you can save the Eye focus calibration settings to a card (per the DP Review early look at the pre-production version). So my guess is that you can save other settings.

I'm simply astounded at the whining about a possible 24mp sensor camera. Only a few years ago, Pro's were shooting with 8, 10, and 12 mp and shooting amazing images. Maybe just go buy the Fuji GFx100. Or the newer Leica...

I don't see Canon making and releasing a 20MP or even 24MP R1 series at this point in time. As the tech upgrades and "know-how" for improved possibilities seem to be pushing their professional model MP higher at least in the mirror-less line-up. My guess is at minimum an R1 will have 30MP and I...

I'm not sure if the OP actually meant Patented or patented. An actual Patent or rather just brand X's "patented" set of features. As an example, Canon's 'patented' ergonomics. I could very well be wrong on the OP'ers intent but it could be read either way IMHO.

My guess is it will come in between $4,999.99 and $5,499.99 USD. Canon seems to follow they're own drumbeat - to a certain extent - in pricing their cameras. I was spot on with my prediction of where the R5 would be priced. Many thought, or were concerned (probably more appropriate), that the R5...

For the 'net' IS affect one must take into consideration the Canon body this RF lens will be mounted on. On an R6 or R5 effective IS stops will be much greater than on an R or RP. I believe Canon's ~2 stops of correction at 1.0X mag is the lens only and not factoring in if shooting on a body...

You'll for certain get a decrease in your wallet's "reach".

With the current state of millions working remotely - from their homes, etc. - I see this as a smart move, a far better option than using your Canon DSLR or MILC as a webcam.

I hear the next Olympics will actually be held on the Moon to avoid COVID problems. Elon Musk has Space-X hard at work on Space planes to ferry both athletes and spectators. But the rumors indicate Space-X is still at least 24 months away from a testable version. Stay tuned... So Canon has some...

I think the likelihood of Canon making an R5a is ~2.5% or less.

Canon already has the Ra for astrophotography.

I think it has to do with the fact that Canon's M-mount cameras are hugely popular sellers in spite of Canon's lack of any enthusiasm for lens development and even in light of the fact the new rumor is that Canon will announce at some point in 2021 the winding down of the M-lineup. There will...

Note - the new RF L lenses do not require a filter on the front of the lens to maintain or achieve their weather resistance to dust and moisture. I believe Canon started changing that design element of their L-series lenses when they came out with the version II of the 100-400mm and the...

I would say you're too close to your subject if a dog is slobbering on your front element. Better off with a IKON waterproof housing I think then... ;-)