Search results

EF version with EF-->RF adaptor.

FEC Fully Electric Camera

FYI: 4.8.30 has some local adjustment features.

I just re-processed a few from 2015... Fall_2015_73 by ken_wall_nyc, on Flickr Fall_2015_41 by ken_wall_nyc, on Flickr Fall_2015_13 by ken_wall_nyc, on Flickr

Thanks. I captured what I saw...

Thx.

Berkshires

Rishi is in love... Rishi is a techno-geek, specifically, a camera techno-geek. He is just in love with the technical extremities that the Sony sensor and the D5 AF (under some use cases) have and not many real users care about. So, don't tease him.

From Iliah Borg (found via DPR): http://www.rawdigger.com/howtouse/Canon-dual-pixel-technology

Re: There Will Be a New EOS M Camera Coming in 2016 10-11 of course...

I agree that the D500 is better than the 7DII. Except, maybe, for available high quality lenses.

You won't get much better high ISO behavior with the D500 compared to the 7DII: http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Canon%20EOS%207D%20Mark%20II,Nikon%20D500

Regarding the bias of DPR. The titles of the recent reviews for the 80D and 1DXII are BS: "The Canon that Can." for the 80D "Canon Catching Up?" for the 1DXII What do these imply?

True, probably can't make those changes at this point. Canon may desire to since the 1DXII is meant to be used at high ISO, not at low. They could be perceived to be behind.

I was alluding to the DR charts that are floating around for the 1DXII and D5. Look at these: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1421137 http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Nikon%20D4S,Nikon%20D5 If these are indeed correct (don't look at absolute values, because there are...

It's delayed because they have to switch back to the old formula of sacrificing low ISO DR for high ISO extension... to compete with the D5. ...that's my guess...

Canon 15-85

It even works for landscapes...

+1

Will the a7s still be the highest ranked Sports Camera by DXO? That is the question... http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Ratings/Sports