Search results

It is with regards to making the R camera replacements the same small size of the M series cameras. But that doesn't seem to be a concern with Canon even though there's still a sizable market for smaller mirrorless cameras like the M50 and M200.

This sounds more like the successor to the M50 based on the rumored specs and naming convention. An Rxxx name would equate to something more along the lines of the M200 (smaller body with little to no front grip, no EVF, etc).

Sounds like the M5 Mark II many M series owners have been waiting a long time for..........

Not all of them did. The M and M2 used EOS menus and software.

It's not irrelevant, its just not something everyone needs. The R3 and R1 both look to be a revivals to the 1D and 1Ds cameras of the past, with the R3 filling in the roll of the 1D (lower resolution, high burst rate shooting) and R1 filling in the roll of the 1Ds (high resolution, lower high...

Oh I know, I just wanted to see their answer hehe :).

And since when has the entire internet been right about anything? :P We know the R3 was never designed to go up against Sony and Nikon's flagship cameras. Canon still has the upcoming R1.

Uh, who told you that?

So says you. CanonRumors has been far more accurate over the years with the rumored specifications of upcoming products then most other photography rumor sites (looking at you SonyAlpha Rumors). And rumors are only as good as Canon's inability to keep specifications from leaking ahead of a...

You've clearly never used a later model EF-M camera. Yes, the original EOS M stumbled out of the gate, and the product line was readjusted when the EOS M3 was launched. The M50, M5, and M6 Mark II are very capable cameras for what they were designed for, and lenses like the 22mm F/2, 32mm...

As would I, but I doubt that will ever happen. With the rumored C50, I'm sure a PL or RF mount option will be the choices for that upcoming cinema camera.

Looks like an extra thick M6 Mark II :P. Good on Sony to create an new form factor to their cinema line. Curious to see how much this will cost, and if the extra thick body will help with heat buildup.

A huge milestone indeed! :) Though I find it odd that they're not including EF-M lenses in the count, as I do see Cinema EOS lenses (which come in either PL or EF mount) in the photo.

Hope so! The EOS M system could do with some constant F/2.8 zoom lenses :).

Meh!! :P

Interesting news, and I can't wait to see what this new direction is! If it means an M5 Mark II with a DIGIC 8 or X processor, IBIS, and Animal Eye AF, then I'm all for it! :)

Wrong on so many levels :). If Canon didn't care about it, they wouldn't be keeping it going up until this point. And seeing as it's been an incredibly popular camera line in many markets shows that it was developed and marketed properly. Yes, it did have a big misstep when first launched in...

The EF-M 22mm f/2 and EF-M 32mm f/1.4 are incredible little lenses for the money :). Lightweight, tack sharp, and great bokeh. Though I do wish Canon had updated the EF-M 15-45mm lens to make it a bit sharper in the corners.

Truly upsetting if this is what Canon is doing. I just don't understand the marketing decision though seeing as no RF mount camera will ever be as small or as low of cost as an M200 for an entry level camera. Heck, it was discussed a while back that the EF-M system was going to replace the Rebel...

You're very much proving that you are new here......