Search results

Nope. All of those cameras are cheaper with their included lens. This new camera is NOT for the casual shooter/newbie, even if Nikon wishes to convince us of so. Too expensive and too complex. It's a toy for Nikon fans who already have a decent kit and want to live the (quite enjoyable) Fuji...

As many have said, the iPhone market has already gobbled up that casual niche. This camera is a toy for Nikon fans that simply will not move tu Fuji. Problem is Fuji has a 10 year advantage on creating very good APS-C glass for MILC. Nikon? Yeah no. We have a grand total of TWO native DX lenses...

An anonymus comment on a forum of a video-centric site that has EOS in its name but actually thinks very little of Canon cameras.

Yep. All the more reason to cut them from the balance sheet. They are not a long term proposition. Practically every other camera maker, save for Canon, has already taken that step.

They corrected their hemorrage with a solid MILC strategy and are posting small but consistent growth. That's a good example for any company to follow.

Sounds good. But prices on RF lenses are still way up for the average APC-C buyers.

Seems like Canon is pulling a Nikon and directing their potential APS-C buyers to the bigboy RF mount. Worked for Nikon. Canon "M" users can't be feeling good about this, but is was sadly expected. No camera company can sustain four different mounts at the same time: EF, EF-S, M and RF. They...

Your iPhone is less stable than your DSLR, specially when attaching external devices. If you value your narrative maybe that's important.

Oh I remember well, my friend. But I didn't cite that example because it was not relevant to this situation: we have some degree of compatibility between EF and RF systems but it's not ideal. Otherwise, Canon wouldn't be forcing this change. There's some overlap between this two systems and...

Absolutely. But there's a difference. Canon EF lenses are fully compatible with both DSLRs and their older 35mm EOS film systems, something you can't replicate with their new RF system unless you use an adapter (I prefer not to). That's a big leap for millions of camera owners that have...

I'm sure this will be a good product by Canon. But at this price the C200 seems more attractive, mainly for the ultra chunky RAW codec. Not sure who the C70 is for. At $5500 it's clearly not for the average V-Logger or amateur. Those RF lenses can be expensive and the C70 seems designed to take...

Other than DPAF for video in the 70D could you cite some examples? Genuine interest. Not trolling.

I'm sure there are some "gently used" 1Ds around there. Maybe not the latest and greatest but certainly competitive. It should also be noted that Canon generally goes full hog in their 1D lineup and then "trickles down" these technologies to lesser models. So buying a slightly older used 1D may...

7DM2 would be the logical choice. 5D series is a completely different beast. It's not specialized in the areas the 7D series is, mainly, rapid-fire shooting and focus acquisition. EosR will necessitate a new lens lineup if you want the absolutely best performance. Looks like you're a prime 1D...

Can you imagine the jello-effect in 8K?

Yep, a hypothetical "C-RF-X00" would include ND filtration, a feature in almost every Canon videocamera already. An intriguing model, for sure.

Had to happen sooner or later.

Guys, it ain't that complicated: Canon is forcing anyone that wants to record good 4K 24p with DPAF to go upstream. That would include a few DSLRs/MILCs and the expensive C-Line videocameras. There's some $$$ to be had with that sub target of consumers. That's about it.

This is CR. Other camera brands don't matter, hehe ;]

There's always Canon DPP.