Search results

shocked its not a 7.1 aperture.... I really hope Canon lives up to the hype it's built around its ability to build new and unique lenses. We went into the RF mount expecting a lot of innovation, but to the same degree that we've been impressed, we've also been pretty disappointed. I still cant...

I got the Canon R6 terrified that 20 megapixels wouldn\'t be enough. On a trip to Kenya & Tanzenia I took about 10 thousand photos on it alone. I thanked GOD it was only 20mp because any more and the file sizes in RAW would have been crazy. I was thinking of paring the R6 with an r5 mark ii when...

I'm really not that excited about Canon's lenses as much as I used to be. Since they've decided to ban 3'd party native lenses for RF mount cameras, i've started restricting my investments in the system altogether. I hate not having options, especially if there's a lens another company makes...

that 200-400 price is probably going to be crazier than theEF version. I was hoping that the rumors of an RF 200-500 were true and that maybe Canon would make it a 2x teleconverter, but wishful thoughts I suppose. The real win however is that the price of the EF 200-400 will probably drop by a...

4K ate 120fps should be a must by now…. Or at least 1080p at 240fps

Wasn't interested at all. Seemed like the most pointless upgrade, but if they're offering trade ins, I may be interested

I remember there being a patient for a 1.4 and a 2.0 teleconverter/adapter that was supposed to be released. THAT would up things a bit if it were added to the 300, 400, 500, and 600. Cost would probably be crazy though

The R6 and the R5 has already caused the price of the 1Dx Mark III to plummet. I was hoping with the R7 and the R1 dropping this year the price of a used 1Dx might drop even further. I wanted it because of some of its video features and because i wanted that unlimited buffer. I often hit the...

It’s probably going to cost almost double what the Sigma costs for it to be just a little bit faster and an incremental increase in sharpness.

anyone else see this? they deleted it

I'd love the Canon RF 300mm-800mm f/8L but I have the much older, and probably HEAVER sigma version, and it's served me well. The canon at f/8 will probably focus just as fast as the sigma at f/5.6, but Canon will probably be lighter.

Interested in seeing what the Canon RF 150mm-600mm f/5-6.3L can do. I have the sigma version but its so horribly built that it broke easily after one trip. I'd love it if Canon finally made one but faster at focusing and with much better quality... Terrified about that price though

I know the megapixel war is supposed to be over but this is underwhelming

The fact that there are features Canon could have given us but didn’t is troubling. It took over a year of people complaining for more log options and duel video recording?

wouldn't it make more sense to buy the Ef version of that 400mm since they're essentially the same? That way you'd at least have the flexibility of using it on a Canon DSLR if you need to.

Will the price for them all be one kidney or two?

I’ve been waiting a while now to see more new and impressive lenses from Canon in the RF mount like we were promised. The 28-70 f/2 lens was an awesome start but after that i was really left underwhelmed. The RF 70-200 is cool but what else is there?

if a Crop sensor camera came out that was better than the R6 & R5 and similar to the R1, I’d be interested.

Canon should have just done everything right the first time. Adding another camera to the R line to combat the overheating just makes you lose more faith with consumers. I don't want to have to buy a whole new camera just because Canon didn't get it right the first time

woah....... 500mm f/ 2.8.....