Search results

That's true. I will say the weight difference is what I love the most when using the Rf70-200. Regardless of physical size, if Canon can shave of some weight with the 100-500 compared to the ef100-400, I'd be a happy man

So did Dr who or Canon make the Rf70-200mm smaller than the EF version?

The R5 is looking good! I was expecting the rf100-500 to be smaller than the ef 100-400. I guess the extra 100mm reach takes away from a possible smaller size

Curious at what Canon will price it at...

Thanks for the reply mate. Will be used as a back up, but if it can get around the 400 shot mark per battery than I would be happy. Always carry spares!!

Yea, would be nice if used the same LP e6 batteries

Hi all, Currently using the R, and looking at purchasing the RP as a back up camera. I know the CIPA battery life rating is low, wondering what everyone is experience battery life wise in the real world. Shots per battery, normally dont shoot video

Assuming its release is near if Canon UK have uploaded a brochure on it? Shoot a bit of astro myself, not sure I shoot enough for a dedicated body though.

Would be interested to find out if it allows selection of focus points on the LCD screen with your finger while looking through the view finder like the r