Search results

Does this mean that the rumored replacement for the RF 24-105 f/4 may eventually be an RF 20-105? Just wondering.

As an Amazon Prime member, I am seeing 7 of these available for purchase.

You are right. Now you are making me do calculations.

This might sound odd, but I still want to put it out there in case Canon is spying on the forum. Why can't Canon make 25mm and 15mm just like the Zeiss Milvus? If you look at the EF prime line up, let's start from 200mm, 135mm, 100mm, 85mm, 50mm, 35mm. I just feel that 25mm and 15mm are the...

Yes I did. Each time I set the SA, I refocused to the general lower yellow area of the flower. I was also on AutoFocus so I re-acquire focus before I take the picture. I also have a set where I used manual focus, so after I adjust the SA, I refocused using the R5's manual focus guide. The...

I got my RF 100mm 2 days ago, my initial quick test does not show a focus shift but I may not have enough experience to deduce accurately. However I want to share a few of my real world tests for the stuff that I will be using the lens for to see how well it performed My second test was to...

I got my RF 100mm 2 days ago, my initial quick test does not show a focus shift but I may not have enough experience to deduce accurately. However I want to share a few of my real world tests for the stuff that I will be using the lens for to see how well it performed. My first test was to...

I ordered from B&H April 14. Order is now processing and I am hoping it ships today.

Looks like a very nice lens, I was hoping it would be about 1200 though. Looks like I will stay with my RF15-35 f/2.8 and deal with the weight.

Well, this was interesting. I believe I came out more confused than when I posted the initial question. I however found out that privacy is a big concern for some people and they will not mind paying to remove anything that MAY compromise that privacy.

I am not sure if this had been discussed anywhere, if so, moderator please delete. So I went to the Canon R5 page and noticed this service...

Not the RF100mm Macro. This is a brand new lens design.

There was also a tripod ring adapter for the EF version and it costs $174 at B&H, so $199 for the RF is not too far fetched for Canon's standard. I eventually bought an Hoage Knock off version for my EF Version because it has Acra Swiss plate built into it and a lot cheaper. Maybe Hoage will...

This must have been overshadowed by the EOS R3 announcement. I believe that I read somewhere about the screen bug but did not pay attention because I was not too interested in video. Thanks for the info and I just downloaded it.

Thanks Jeanluc, I actually had one before and have used it here and there. It was a crazy story: So when the R5 was announced, I traded my two EOS R with the EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro to Adorama with the hope of adding a little more to purchase the R5. I did that because I felt I had to let...

I told myself that if it is more than $1499, I am out. I just bought the EF version in November last year and I have not even used it once because I am deployed. Guess I have to sell it now as I just pre-ordered the RF version from B&H. I just hate using adapters.

I got a shipping confirmation today for my 4th of August order. Looks like they are gradually catching up with the backlog. Hope it will be generally available before Christmas.

Did anyone have any luck getting shipping info from the 10/20 shipment yet?

RF 35mm f/1.2 RF 100mm f/2.8 Macro RF 135mm f/1.8 or 1.4

I got tired of waiting because I am traveling to Asia and wanted to take it with me. I ordered the Grey Market version from Steve at Deals All Year. I paid a premium but got it the next day. I have it for just one day and I know that is the camera I have been waiting for for a few years.