i don't think anyone has said the 6d af is in the same ballpark as the 5diii. Center point only, its probably a tie, but everything else its not even close.
Upvote
0
robbymack said:i don't think anyone has said the 6d af is in the same ballpark as the 5diii. Center point only, its probably a tie, but everything else its not even close.
gimmeadeal19 said:If you read my original post, I rented the 6D to try it out. I did not buy it. I was seeking other opinions because many have said the 6D's AF was in the same ballpark of the 5D m III.
MathieuB said:However, for action and moving objects, forget it, it's terrible. I took pictures of butterflies last week and my hit rate of butterflies in flight is abysmal, 10-15% at most
rifz said:How does the 6D compare to the 5DmkII? they are about the same price. Could someone who has used both give us their thoughts. thanks
gimmeadeal19 said:If you read my original post, I rented the 6D to try it out. I did not buy it. I was seeking other opinions because many have said the 6D's AF was in the same ballpark of the 5D m III. I found this not to be the case with the kit 24-105 f/4.
Chuck Alaimo said:So we'll see what this thing can do...
hsbn said:One thing I don't get is before the 5DMIII came out, people were doing fine with 5DMII. I did. I shot a lot of wedding with 5DMII. My clients are happy, and I'm proud of my work. It's still a great camera for me. I bet it is still an awesome camera for many working pro out there. Yet, the 6D is a little better overall but it seems like everyone is trying to bash the camera. If you could take great pictures with the 5DMII, you can take great picture with the 6D. I know its AF is not in the same league with the 5DMIII but it is still a great camera IMHO.
It has its limit, but I've seen many great bird in fly photos taken with the 5DMII. I don't see any reason why the 6D can be any worst than the 5DMII. Or suddenly, the 5DMII became a worth-less camera at the end of its cycle.
gimmeadeal19 said:I rented a 6D camera body to take helicopter skiing in Canada. I brought my 24-105 f/4, 40 f/2.8, and my 50 f/1.8 lenses. I found the autofocus to be slow with all 3 lenses, especially in lower light. I really experimented by changing many of the autofocus parameters and resetting the rental body to factory settings to make sure nothing was amiss. I found the 6D autofocus to be for the most part as good as my Rebel 550D with each of my lenses. I was really disappointed because a want a new body to replace my Rebel. Lensrentals.com checked the 6D and found it up to factory specs. Looks like I may have to pony up for the 5D m III. Does anyone think the climate and elevation had anything to do with the slow AF? Or does the 6D really have a mediocre AF?
gimmeadeal19 said:If you read my original post, I rented the 6D to try it out. I did not buy it. I was seeking other opinions because many have said the 6D's AF was in the same ballpark of the 5D m III. I found this not to be the case with the kit 24-105 f/4.
Marsu42 said:There still is no (zero, 0) full cross point at all @f2.8 (only @f4+), so precision with fast lenses esp. on moving objects should be very bad.
MintMark said:I think that's a little harsh. With a faster lens you do still have the centre cross point... it's just no more accurate than with a slower lens.Marsu42 said:There still is no (zero, 0) full cross point at all @f2.8 (only @f4+), so precision with fast lenses esp. on moving objects should be very bad.
Marsu42 said:I admit my annoyance with the 6d af means that I might be a bit simplistic - but in fact many people seem to think that the 6d has a xxd-style center cross point (extra sensitive for f2.8 lenses) while with the 6d the opposite is true (non-cross overlay). Then think of the 1dx/5d3 double-cross points - doh.
neuroanatomist said:As you state, the 6D doesn't even have that. Just sayin'.