Hello everyone,
I've been looking to get myself a Canon DSLR mainly for photography (potentially some videos, but main focus would be taking pictures). I've used to have a Canon 600D, which I had to unfortunately sell. Now since I've been again looking into the options again, there seems to be a huge selection (even from the same provider, in this case, Canon) and I'm a bit overwhelmed on what would be the best choice. Now keep in mind, I would be looking into all of these cameras second hand.
Looking into the options, the Canon 77D has their new sensor, which should help with the ISOs (when compared to other choices). However, since 25K ISO (or even the expanded 52K in 77Ds case) is quite a lot, is it even usable at this point or would get too grainy either way? Maybe it's just a glorified selling point for the camera?
Perhaps it would be best to go with the 5D mk2 as a full-frame? They have been getting quite significantly more affordable now (though with higher mileage as well).
The use of the camera would be taking pictures of anything from landscapes, urban, automotive (action and still) and night-sky. Previously, with my 600D, I've been struggling with exposure in low-light conditions, that's why the new sensor with the 77D seems appealing to me.
Maybe there are other models I should be considering? Lower weight is kind of a plus but isn't a deal breaker to me.
Finally, I know I've put in some different price ranges, but I've been thinking if there's really that much point into spending more money on the body if I won't be doing professional photography either way? I did different digital camera comporation, but my experiance isn't good to choose better camera.
Thanks for all your help!
I've been looking to get myself a Canon DSLR mainly for photography (potentially some videos, but main focus would be taking pictures). I've used to have a Canon 600D, which I had to unfortunately sell. Now since I've been again looking into the options again, there seems to be a huge selection (even from the same provider, in this case, Canon) and I'm a bit overwhelmed on what would be the best choice. Now keep in mind, I would be looking into all of these cameras second hand.
Looking into the options, the Canon 77D has their new sensor, which should help with the ISOs (when compared to other choices). However, since 25K ISO (or even the expanded 52K in 77Ds case) is quite a lot, is it even usable at this point or would get too grainy either way? Maybe it's just a glorified selling point for the camera?
Perhaps it would be best to go with the 5D mk2 as a full-frame? They have been getting quite significantly more affordable now (though with higher mileage as well).
The use of the camera would be taking pictures of anything from landscapes, urban, automotive (action and still) and night-sky. Previously, with my 600D, I've been struggling with exposure in low-light conditions, that's why the new sensor with the 77D seems appealing to me.
Maybe there are other models I should be considering? Lower weight is kind of a plus but isn't a deal breaker to me.
Finally, I know I've put in some different price ranges, but I've been thinking if there's really that much point into spending more money on the body if I won't be doing professional photography either way? I did different digital camera comporation, but my experiance isn't good to choose better camera.
Thanks for all your help!
Last edited: