I'm not going to quote or call anyone out in particular, but there are some incredibly ignorant posts being made in the defense of Canon here.
Video features mean very little to me, as I am a photographer. It doesn't mean I can't take a step back and identify the videography market as an important feature in cameras that should be taken seriously and coexist with stills in some way. Having video features that are competitive with the market only helps to improve Canon as a brand and the potential of its future cameras. But, we're talking about 24 frames per second. If you're not aware of what the significance to this frame rate is because you "don't care about video," then you probably shouldn't be commenting about it. ;-) But I will briefly explain to you that 24fps is the industry standard for film. The overwhelming majority of movies and video are shot at 24fps because it still allows motion blur and provides and organic and natural look to video. This dates back to nearly a century of filmmaking.
The absence of this frame rate option essentially kills it from any consideration of being a video camera for basically anyone. A big problem is that 30fps video cannot be used in a 24fps timeline without frame dropping and 60fps will naturally be slow motion when imported or you lose the organic motion blur if it's speed back up to normal speed and it can look very strange alongside ture 24fps footage. Some on YouTube use 30fps out of personal preference, but they are a minority and it's not the cinematic look most seek.
If Canon had just included 24fps - an option available in the M100, M50, 4000D, M1, M3, M5, M6, T4i, T5i, T6i, T7i, 77D, 60D, 70D, 80D, 7D, 7D Mark II, 6D, 6D Mark II, EOS R, 5D Mark II, 5D Mark III, 5D Mark IV, and so many other cameras etc. - then it would challenge absolutely nothing in the lineup, but expand the usefulness of this tool to so many people.
So please get off the principal of "if you want a video camera....buy a video camera!" Because when you're talking about the most rudimentary thing in video established in the 1920s. Your argument is moot. This is laughably inexcusable. And this is coming from a veteran Canon shooter that loves this brand. Just because I follow a brand loyally doesn't mean I have to follow blindly.