They are not going to tell you what they were looking at.What were they working out with those models? I just read a review of them that said everything on them works fine. I don't think Canon was debugging its system. It just didn't see a point in releasing a pro body when there were only 4-5 lenses it could use, and which body would then be out of date by the time there were over a dozen. Then as now: take a year or two to build up the lens system, and let the pro market start penciling in a purchase of the forthcoming model when they see your commitment. THEN release the pro model. It worked before. I don't see why it won't keep working.
More than enough and also borne from observation of the hoard of wildlife and sports photographers NOT migrating to the Eos R....
If you are concerned to my photographic credentials...go look me up. My name googles well. I've also been here a long time and I regularly post to this forums pages such as the various lens and camera pages here with portfolio imagery. Where as...you seem to have arrived here late December 2018...and have posted only dialogue. You claim to have a 600mm f4, a very serious piece of kit...so let s see some pictures. Pop them in 600mm f4 LIS page.
No-one's going to take your self-appraisal for something like that. Why don't you just tell us the weeks' experience you've had learning it, and we'll decide whether it's enough or not.More than enough
How does mere observation magically inform you that AF is the issue, not, say, battery life, memory slots, megapixels, a lack of budget to roll over kit, or lack of information (or indeed, disinformation) about the new system?borne from observation of the hoard of wildlife and sports photographers NOT migrating to the Eos R....
I don't care about your credentials; given that lots of horrible photographers may be good judges of AF and good photographers be bad judges... best travel photog I know turns out not to have even understood diffraction for her 20 years. Regular posting also doesn't demonstrate you know what you're talking about.If you are concerned to my photographic credentials... I regularly post to this forums pages... You claim to have a 600mm f4....
So you have a group of working photographers with good quality gear... Canon starts down the mirrorless path with a low end FF mirrorless and an introductory model. Neither of these units are a significant improvement (and in many ways a downgrade) from the 5D series cameras that most working pros tend towards. The same holds true for the fanatical birders....No-one's going to take your self-appraisal for something like that. Why don't you just tell us the weeks' experience you've had learning it, and we'll decide whether it's enough or not.
How does mere observation magically inform you that AF is the issue, not, say, battery life, memory slots, megapixels, a lack of budget to roll over kit, or lack of information (or indeed, disinformation) about the new system?
The EOS R is utterly silent (except for aperture, if you're not shooting wide-open) in silent mode.Yesterday I was at a conference, there were two photographers, one of them sold his Canon gear and was now working with Sony Alpha. The other one was using the 1Dx mark II. Damn, that noisy shutter was disturbing .. and man what a relief to be able to work in complete silence.
So PLEASE CANON, make that camera affordable and silent!
And built in WIFI please or this thing will absolutely not sell.
This also means that carrying around a big fancy camera makes you UFO-abduction-proof. Win!problem with saquatch and ufo photographing is those thingies can see to future. All they need do to avoid getting photographed is choosing path what doesnt lead to getting photographed. Some lucky peoples may get photoes from drunken sasquatch but so rare thing ,its usually amateur photographer with crappy equipemnts.
The EOS R is utterly silent (except for aperture, if you're not shooting wide-open) in silent mode.
The EOS R also has Bluetooth and Wifi. You can see the liveview on your smartphone or PC, adjust focus point, change camera settings and shoot. Then, you can have the camera automatically upload the resulting images.
I'm not saying the R is pro-use. Ergonomics are poor due to the smaller body. Battery life is 1/3 what it needs to be and it needs another memory slot. But, I'd expect doodads like Wifi and Bluetooth that are in the mid-level MILFF will surely be in the high-end SLR. Conversely the next sensor will surely be shared between the SLR and the MILFF, so if the SLR is too loud, the pro R will be what you want.
Yes, certainly a longer test is better. I had the camera for an hour to test in the hand and have only these impressions. I did not understand how to set the focus point quickly with just the right hand and without putting the camera off the eye. The Canon presenter had no idea.I cannot imagine that a presentation is going to be long enough to figure out how to use the camera.
It certainly focuses extremely quickly once you learn how it works.
You can certainly run the entire camera with the right hand. If you want two hands, you can use the left for support as usual, as well as zoom, focus, and if you want, adjusting the control ring (I have it set for aperture in A P and F modes).
My recommendation is to use the touch bar for AF mode, and the right-hand part of the touch screen in relative mode to move focus point. If you haven't tried that mode, long enough to get used to it, you wouldn't know enough to make a decision.
FOR NON-SERVO AF: hit the trashcan to center the AF point, momentarily put that over your subject and half-depress shutter. Then reframe and camera will continue to focus on that target, even taking into account non-flat or non-spherical plane of focus Since it is using the contrast at the actual pixels, it will absolutely nail sharpness of even with the 85/1.2 if you do this. In contrast, "single-focus and recompose" on an SLR, even if your subject and your camera don't move by even 1cm, still won't nail focus with a huge aperture, because the DOF will be far less than the amount of plane-of-focus variance. THIS IS HUGE: the SLRs literally cannot focus accurately enough for the 50/1.0, 85/1.2 etc. with "single-focus and recompose" whereas the R will nail it to the centimeter or less.I did not understand how to set the focus point quickly with just the right hand and without putting the camera off the eye. The Canon presenter had no idea.