gdanmitchell
When in doubt, doubt.
For those of us who need high resolution in a Canon full frame camera, the 5DsR has been an outstanding tool. I've gotten more than my money's worth from mine.
With 100MP miniMF systems on the horizon, with their obvious appeal to a number of landscape photographers, a 75Mp full frame Canon system seems like a logical next step from the 5DsR. Despite the usual concerns about dynamic range and noise... I'm sure that the performance will be at least as good as the current model in those regards.
I also think that in most ways the 5DsR series is a fine candidate for a mirrorless body. I mostly use my 5DsR for landscape photography on the tripod, and I essentially always shoot in live view mode, so that transition would not be an issue.
I think Canon will need to at least equal (and, I hope improve at least a bit) the AF performance in a hypothetical high MP mirrorless camera. Some of us use the 5DsR for things other than landscape — I use mine for bird photography — and we still need at least decent performance in AF.
With 100MP miniMF systems on the horizon, with their obvious appeal to a number of landscape photographers, a 75Mp full frame Canon system seems like a logical next step from the 5DsR. Despite the usual concerns about dynamic range and noise... I'm sure that the performance will be at least as good as the current model in those regards.
I also think that in most ways the 5DsR series is a fine candidate for a mirrorless body. I mostly use my 5DsR for landscape photography on the tripod, and I essentially always shoot in live view mode, so that transition would not be an issue.
I think Canon will need to at least equal (and, I hope improve at least a bit) the AF performance in a hypothetical high MP mirrorless camera. Some of us use the 5DsR for things other than landscape — I use mine for bird photography — and we still need at least decent performance in AF.
Upvote
0