you are confusing magnification (which the M50 has little of). The EVF spec has little bearing on this. just because it's the same dots doesn't mean it's any less good than the Sony's as an example. up to this year the best EVF's only had 2.36Mdots.I really have little first hand expirence with EVFs, just working with the M50 and R side by side. If it’s the same EVF as the M50 than it’s a disappointment to me, “entry level” or not, on a $1300-1600 camera.
Edit: And I am happy to be wrong here, if this is just an issue in my head and works out fine, then even better.
I'd suggest thinking consumer specs - which you I guess weren't. what did you expect? a high end video machine handling broadcast capable bitrates and bit depth?Well we got 4k24 which is fine I suppose. Now just wAiting to hear what sort of output over hdmi it will have.
Cool, thanks for the education.you are confusing magnification (which the M50 has little of). The EVF spec has little bearing on this. just because it's the same dots doesn't mean it's any less good than the Sony's as an example. up to this year the best EVF's only had 2.36Mdots.
to be fair, i'm waiting to see what magnification this will have. hopefully it uses the same OPTICS as the R, just a cheaper EVF panel.Cool, thanks for the education.
CanonWatch wrote it’s definitely not the same sensor, only the same res. But I don’t know how much I believe that..Need to see some info on this sensor too... is a 6D2 sensor? Or is it a new version? Hmmmm....
As per several of my earlier posts on the topic, something relatively similar to the EOS R as the EOS R specs were very basic at 4k30. I’d previously stated that while 10 bit 422 clog out over hdmi (on the EOS R) would be nice, i had lesser faith it would make it to the RP. (Maybe just Clog). I’d prefer the RP if only for the lesser crop factor but the EOS R will do as well.I'd suggest thinking consumer specs - which you I guess weren't. what did you expect? a high end video machine handling broadcast capable bitrates and bit depth?
Thats what I thought as well. If memory serves the 6D2 was built on the older fab process where the ADC is off chip. My theory was this was the same size sensor but built on the new process with the ADC onboard. Which would effectively be a whole new sensor with a totally different pedformanceCanonWatch wrote it’s definitely not the same sensor, only the same res. But I don’t know how much I believe that..
they are guessing.CanonWatch wrote it’s definitely not the same sensor, only the same res. But I don’t know how much I believe that..
it's actually not.Thats what I thought as well. If memory serves the 6D2 was built on the older fab process
yeah don't be counting on it.The sensor is the last important variable for me: Because I need some DR I need a sensor which is comparable to 200D or M50. But I am confident that Canon has listened to the DR fights on different rumors and the sensor will have some robust 13.5+ stops of DR.
I'd be fine if the HDMI output wasn't 10 bit, but would actually be surprised if it's limited to 8bit. The HDMI hardware being used is now becoming pretty standard.As per several of my earlier posts on the topic, something relatively similar to the EOS R as the EOS R specs were very basic at 4k30. I’d previously stated that while 10 bit 422 clog out over hdmi (on the EOS R) would be nice, i had lesser faith it would make it to the RP. (Maybe just Clog). I’d prefer the RP if only for the lesser crop factor but the EOS R will do as well.
Many times, I’d like something smaller than my 1DX2 to shoot video as Ive been doing more
Of that lately. Beautiful video from it, but it is bulkly to balanace on a gimbal (Ronin M) and cant send 4k out.
I usually shoot in 4k24 anyway (interviews and standard b roll stuff) so that works great for me as long as i get it out the HDMi port
That’s what Id expect. 8bit output insteadI'd be fine if the HDMI output wasn't 10 bit, but would actually be surprised if it's limited to 8bit. The HDMI hardware being used is now becoming pretty standard.
The crop will be around halfway in between the crop of the EOS R and your 1DX Mark II.
I don't see why not.Does it have sensor protection too, like EOS R, when the lens is not connected to the body?