Focus position (Distance) reported to the Camera body.What lens-body communication is required to support manual focus (other than power)?
Edit: also aperture required when fired and IS info.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Focus position (Distance) reported to the Camera body.What lens-body communication is required to support manual focus (other than power)?
The vlogging choices I gave are based on using the camera without a crop, so the 1080 mode or a 4K camera with no or little crop. It's always best to move the camera as far away from you when vlogging, but the tighter the focal length(or equivalent), the shot will have more camera shake. To me, the crop is annoying because I wouldn't want to pay the extra for a full frame and not be able to use it, plus you'd have to change lenses when switching from photos to video. For some like yourself, it may not be a problem.
...I don't think this is intended to compete with the a7RIII...
...I am betting on a higher resolution version which has more of the features expected in a 5D series camera...
I’m not convinced it’s better than a mechanical coupling, if nothing else because of the lack of tactile feedback. There’s a reason we’re seeing more haptics in touchscreens. Implementation is also key. For example, the MF implementation on some STM lenses (e.g. the M18-150) has a variable focus throw – if you turn the MF ring rapidly, the focus throw is much shorter than if you turn it slowly. That’s hard to become accustomed to, particularly without the tactile feedback (Basically, you don’t develop the muscle memory).Focus by wire - with a "really right" implementation [lag-free, totally responsive, smooth stepless control, no "play" I am sure it is better than mechanical gears. Hope it is done well on the RF lenses.
(Actually i wouldn't be surprised if Sony execs now are rolling on the floor laughing)
Yeah, just like they laughed when Canon launched the EOS M.(Actually i wouldn't be surprised if Sony execs now are rolling on the floor laughing)
(Actually i wouldn't be surprised if Sony execs now are rolling on the floor laughing)
Might be like the “D” in 5D. The 5R, perhaps?
I doubt it.. it is not like Canon released a DSLR called the "Canon D". Something tells me this is a bit different - had Canon called this a R5 or R10 or whatever then it would've made sense, but this is different for sure.More likely R5... like M5.
I think in respect of full frame mirrorless a Sony camera would fit much better as a versatile workhorse, allowing me to easily use and experiment with a huge range of lenses out there in the wild, many at much lower prices, yet delivering very good image quality.
(Actually i wouldn't be surprised if Sony execs now are rolling on the floor laughing)
I didn't really think I'd be interested in a mirrorless camera, but this has me thinking that at some point in the future I might consider moving in that direction.
"This system is a marketing tool to enforce customer brand fidelity, not made with the photog in mind at-all. This system is a self-defense system for Canon. The new enhanced lens communication that facilitate the extra control ring on the lens is actually made to make you as a user more dependent on the canon line. Once you start getting used with this control system you will find harder to use other systems and psychologically a conditioning will occur to become a canon conservative. Next is the lack of IBIS and as i noticed no mention of focus peaking. Without these features you won't be able to easily use any full manual lenses either vintage or lenses like Samyang, Laowa, or Mayer Optics and Zeiss on the more expensive side. Even if you can use them your life will continue to be harder... so you will tend to keep using Canon lenses. With this approach, Canon probably also want to secure that they can justify the extra money they charge for the lenses, the extra control ring is an exclusive feature, also they can still justify and sell the IS in each lens since no IBIS. As a side-note is interesting to see if Canon will allow 3rd party lens manufacturers like SIgma or Tamron to implement the new control ring, also is questionable if that will be even profitable for Sigma and Tamron, since those lenses would be Canon only... I think in the long run this road is a bad one for Canon, since for creators on a lower budget like myself, or young creators who want to step up their game, Sony offers a solid system, where they can start with cheap good full manual lenses, possibility to adapt almost anything efficiently, offering also a growing collection of high-end lenses. I am really disappointed by Canon. I was really open to change my plans from buying a Sony. My first conclusion would be: stay away from Canon if you value gear versatility. Even if i own 6 Canon lenses and i plan also adding one of the more advanced film EOS camera to my kit, I think in respect of full frame mirrorless a Sony camera would fit much better as a versatile workhorse, allowing me to easily use and experiment with a huge range of lenses out there in the wild, many at much lower prices, yet delivering very good image quality."
(Actually i wouldn't be surprised if Sony execs now are rolling on the floor laughing)
FWIW I think it should be possible to adapt FD lenses to R, something that was not really possible with EF.
I'm surprised they didn't include an R-mount ultrawide in the announcement. Such a lens stands to benefit most from the new mount format.
I doubt it.. it is not like Canon released a DSLR called the "Canon D". Something tells me this is a bit different - had Canon called this a R5 or R10 or whatever then it would've made sense, but this is different for sure.
My guess is that they will use a different naming scheme than before, perhaps aligning to Sony, and calling a "pro" version an R-X and a "sport" version an R-S
"This system is a marketing tool to enforce customer brand fidelity, not made with the photog in mind at-all. This system is a self-defense system for Canon. The new enhanced lens communication that facilitate the extra control ring on the lens is actually made to make you as a user more dependent on the canon line. Once you start getting used with this control system you will find harder to use other systems and psychologically a conditioning will occur to become a canon conservative. Next is the lack of IBIS and as i noticed no mention of focus peaking. Without these features you won't be able to easily use any full manual lenses either vintage or lenses like Samyang, Laowa, or Mayer Optics and Zeiss on the more expensive side. Even if you can use them your life will continue to be harder... so you will tend to keep using Canon lenses. With this approach, Canon probably also want to secure that they can justify the extra money they charge for the lenses, the extra control ring is an exclusive feature, also they can still justify and sell the IS in each lens since no IBIS. As a side-note is interesting to see if Canon will allow 3rd party lens manufacturers like SIgma or Tamron to implement the new control ring, also is questionable if that will be even profitable for Sigma and Tamron, since those lenses would be Canon only... I think in the long run this road is a bad one for Canon, since for creators on a lower budget like myself, or young creators who want to step up their game, Sony offers a solid system, where they can start with cheap good full manual lenses, possibility to adapt almost anything efficiently, offering also a growing collection of high-end lenses. I am really disappointed by Canon. I was really open to change my plans from buying a Sony. My first conclusion would be: stay away from Canon if you value gear versatility. Even if i own 6 Canon lenses and i plan also adding one of the more advanced film EOS camera to my kit, I think in respect of full frame mirrorless a Sony camera would fit much better as a versatile workhorse, allowing me to easily use and experiment with a huge range of lenses out there in the wild, many at much lower prices, yet delivering very good image quality."
(Actually i wouldn't be surprised if Sony execs now are rolling on the floor laughing)