Sony RX100 VII announced with the new 1-inch IMX 383 sensor.
Not announced, still just rumoured?
Anyway, it can't be any good - can't put a filter on it...
Upvote
0
Sony RX100 VII announced with the new 1-inch IMX 383 sensor.
Did I miss the announcement?Sony RX100 VII announced
Ah, so this is the one Canon most likely uses in the III. The other Sony 1" sensors are too slow for 30fps raw.with the new 1-inch IMX 383 sensor.
Actually, it supports up to 100fps in 4k, but there are multiple catches.The new 20-megapixel BSI Stacked CMOS sensor will provide continuous 4K video shooting at speeds up to 50/60 frames per second,
Unlikely. It's one thing if you can receive such a raw stream from the sensor, and another thing if you can actually convert these 1.2 gigabits per second of raw data into a format suitable for storage - without overheating.G7 X Mark III will support 4Kp50/60 ??
I understand that Sonys are still the camera-shaped handwarmers of choice...without overheating.
Ha ha that makes Sony the winter cameras manufacturerI understand that Sonys are still the camera-shaped handwarmers of choice...
Ha ha. (You don't know my wife do you....?)So accordingly you sold all your other kit...
A fully swingy tilty flippy screen also would add bulk and weight. I want it to fit in my pocket. I use the tilting when traveling for shooting straight up mostly, inside domes and towers, for example, without craning my neck. On occasion I shoot from waist level while looking down. I can see how this might work well for photographing people in public.Disagree, I much prefer this style of screen. It's faster to tilt and much less obtrusive for street/travel photography. The fully articulated screens are nice for slow paced landscape photography and the like, but they're a bit unwieldy for the types of photography I do.
Has a 'grille' in the top view, I think your suggestion of a mic is correct (I don't see one on the front).Curious what that notch above the logo (top plate) is. Accessory port? Omnidirectional microphone? Grill for the elves to breathe?
Yep, and if they did do a fully-articulating screen, it would probably be too flimsy at that size.A fully swingy tilty flippy screen also would add bulk and weight. I want it to fit in my pocket.
Has a 'grille' in the top view, I think your suggestion of a mic is correct (I don't see one on the front).
I shoot a lot of street using the tilting screen on my M5. I'm praying that they don't switch to an articulated one on the Mark 2.A fully swingy tilty flippy screen also would add bulk and weight. I want it to fit in my pocket. I use the tilting when traveling for shooting straight up mostly, inside domes and towers, for example, without craning my neck. On occasion I shoot from waist level while looking down. I can see how this might work well for photographing people in public.
For the longest time 120fps was my 'must have' feature, and when I finally bought a camera that had it, I find that 60fps is better suited for the overwhelming majority of tasks.1080@120. My EOS R can't do that at 5 X the price for just the body.
When it comes to sensors, Canon is a relatively small producer of specialty sensors. If Canon marketing decides that the camera doesn't require DPAF, buying a generic sensor makes more sense than producing an equivalent one in-house.From the company of the Canon size, I would expect their own sensors.