HTML:
<div id="fb_share_1" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2011/05/ef-16-40-f4l-is-cr1/" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php">Share</a></div><div><script src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share" type="text/javascript"></script></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a class="tm_button" rel="&style=normal&b=2" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2011/05/ef-16-40-f4l-is-cr1/"></a></div>
<strong>A replacement to the 17-40 f/4L?</strong>
Apparently a patent for an EF 16-40 f/4L IS will be filed soon and I’m told to keep an eye for it over the next couple of weeks.</p>
<p><strong>CR’s Take
</strong>The 17-40 is one of the best values in “L†lenses and is a cash cow for Canon. It does need improvements on the edges and Nikon stabilized their f/4 full frame wide angle. It’s a believable replacement.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
<p>–
<a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/279582-USA/Canon_8806A002_EF_17_40mm_f_4L_USM.html?BI=2466&KBID=3296">Canon EF 17-40 f/4L $839 @ B&H</a>