I have been reading the reviews, and know that this lens can do things my 16-35mm can't. But, what type of pictures besides buildings and cities can I expect to take with this? I will admit that I like the results from this lens that other people have produced. http://www.flickr.com/photos/xavibarca/5275899631/#in/photostream (check out his other pics too). I would like to know about taking long exposure night time shots with a full Moon, but no other lighting. I know that at f/4 and an ISO of 400, it will take a while.
I also like the ability to stitch together panoramic photos. I do need to look into an easy way to do that and HDR photos on my mac and be able to do them quickly.
http://hcam.de/en/canon-tse-collar.htm
Here is a picture that I found that shows what I don't like about the 16-35mm, but I'm not sure the way it was tilted here is perfect:
http://macdanzigphotography.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/ts-e-17mm-lens-review-part-2/
http://macdanzigphotography.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/yg3w5295.jpg
http://macdanzigphotography.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/yg3w5296.jpg
I really like the vertical lines in images and I have been having problems achieving that sometimes with the 16-35mm.
And I know that this lens gets great reviews. But, do you think that it is worth the price and weight when hiking? Maybe this lens, a 1.4x and a 50 f/1.2 wouldn't be a bad combination.
I also like the ability to stitch together panoramic photos. I do need to look into an easy way to do that and HDR photos on my mac and be able to do them quickly.
http://hcam.de/en/canon-tse-collar.htm
Here is a picture that I found that shows what I don't like about the 16-35mm, but I'm not sure the way it was tilted here is perfect:
http://macdanzigphotography.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/ts-e-17mm-lens-review-part-2/
http://macdanzigphotography.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/yg3w5295.jpg
http://macdanzigphotography.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/yg3w5296.jpg
I really like the vertical lines in images and I have been having problems achieving that sometimes with the 16-35mm.
And I know that this lens gets great reviews. But, do you think that it is worth the price and weight when hiking? Maybe this lens, a 1.4x and a 50 f/1.2 wouldn't be a bad combination.