I'm sorry Davo, that is incorrect, the correct answer is 'Redwood Photos'. But thanks for playing.I know what this thread needs!....MOON photos!
Upvote
0
I'm sorry Davo, that is incorrect, the correct answer is 'Redwood Photos'. But thanks for playing.I know what this thread needs!....MOON photos!
I'm going $3,799 - $4,200 USD. The 5DsR came in higher than past 5D models, and accounting for inflation since the release of the 5D IV and considering some of the capacity listed here, I think that's pretty reasonable
Once again, I am more than happy to take bets on that....I'm going with $4,500. This is assuming it has 8k30p / 6k45p / 4k60p, with raw. Video specs demand (and bring in) money like no other.... They really should make another version with dumbed down video for stills-only shooters becuase if its limited to 4k30p i would imagine this is a $3k (maybe bit more initial few months) camera.
Once again, I am more than happy to take bets on that....
Nooo!!!! We need to hang on to all the semi-rational people we can.If it has the stills specs we read about earlier and the video will be hampered in some way like Ahsanford suggested (which is common and should be acceptable) I will buy it for my first new camera in 8 years and stay off the forum to avoid the video insanity cackling of the hens.
If it was software limited to have those specs, it'd be like $50 cheaper, perhaps. Once the R&D goes in to solving the data throughput and cooling issues, it doesnt matter if its 6k30, 4k120, etc...it costs the same.I'm going with $4,500. This is assuming it has 8k30p / 6k45p / 4k60p, with raw. Video specs demand (and bring in) money like no other.... They really should make another version with dumbed down video for stills-only shooters becuase if its limited to 4k30p i would imagine this is a $3k (maybe bit more initial few months) camera.
It will be in the $3500 rangenot willing to bet i hope its cheaper... and i think canon should because in one release and in a matter of months i really believe they can end sony's lead in FF mirrorless and halt interest in the s1h. The RF lenses and EF adapters will make alot more for them.
I'm going with $4,500. This is assuming it has 8k30p / 6k45p / 4k60p, with raw. Video specs demand (and bring in) money like no other.... They really should make another version with dumbed down video for stills-only shooters becuase if its limited to 4k30p i would imagine this is a $3k (maybe bit more initial few months) camera.
If it was software limited to have those specs, it'd be like $50 cheaper, perhaps. Once the R&D goes in to solving the data throughput and cooling issues, it doesnt matter if its 6k30, 4k120, etc...it costs the same.
Nikon Df came out without video and cost basically the same as the D800 that slightly proceeded it. If you want a camera made cheap because no effort was put into R&D for video, two already exist in the R lineup, the R and the RP, which directly recycle the 5dIV and 6dII
6K was never mentioned. there's no reason for it. 4K120p was metioned (but probably cropped)
You want more heresy, while I’m at it? I couldn’t care less about two card slots. Starting with my Kodak DC120 (1 MP, CF card), the great majority of my digital cameras have had one card slot and that has never been a problem for me. But I also have just one engine in my car (which in ancient times was a problem from time to time).
Burst rates: Buffer depth matters, not card transfer rate. CFExpress is necessary for video only.
Honestly, more real estate on the back side would be nice, which means the grip could be bigger too. I am happy with the R grip, but find the rear side a little cramped.
You are aware, are you not, that many new cars today have no spare tires? My 2018 Prius, is one example of many.Using the car analogy: who needs spare tires? *I’ve* never had a flat
except... no mode dial. noooooooooo
You are aware, are you not, that many new cars today have no spare tires? My 2018 Prius, is one example of many.
(And are you aware that italics and bold and the like are available in the format bar so that you don’t have to use dorky asterisks for emphasis ?)