I was just reading an article over there that said Sigma is on the fence over making lenses for the RF mount.Which makes me sad because I don’t have $2-3k per pop to spend on Canon made native glass
I understand that. My point was that today is the first time it's been explicitly stated that it WILL BE a dev announcement and no more (though, fair enough, with the rumored release not until July, you could put those pieces together).Thats the nature of a development announcement: Some teasing without showing it all ...
Respectfully disagree. I do appreciate your writeup, though.
Human hands didn't get smaller with the removal of the mirror. So while it's absolutely easier to carry a body -- broken down without a lens on it -- it is less enjoyable, less comfortable, less real estate for controls and dedicated buttons when actually using it.
So shrinking down every FF body because everyone it doing it is the behavior of lemmings. It implies a lack of insight on Canon's part to see that folks are headed to Sony for a dozen reasons other than size.
If Canon will have 4 or 5 lines of RF mount bodies, they would be foolish to not consider the unique ergonomic needs of each target user base.
There is no one body footprint to unite them all, and Canon playing that there might be surely seems like a cost containment / shared inventory move. And I honestly hope I'm wrong about that.
- A
Все это сказки, 8k будет только для timelapse
If that’s legit, then we still don’t have a traditional mode dial.
No one said it had to be a DOF button.
If real, I'm guessing is a programmable/assignable button (switch to silent running, switch to servo, etc, snap to center AF -- who knows?).
- A
Tony is a fine person, but he stopped being a fan of Canon a long time ago. He's all in for Sony now.
i just got that lens and the 70-200rf.The L series RF primes basically destroy the L series EF primes, so . . . yeah.
Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM Lens Image Quality
View the image quality delivered by the Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM Lens using ISO 12233 Resolution Chart lab test results. Compare the image quality of this lens with other lenses.www.the-digital-picture.com
He pretty much said what I said: Canon coming out with this camera could theoretically be true, but it wouldn't be in character. Would be like Bernie Sanders suddenly revealing he was a 32 year old mother of three who was president of her college's young Republicans. Not in so many words.
"In character"? WTH with this roleplaying? Canon is a business, not a political showman.He pretty much said what I said: Canon coming out with this camera could theoretically be true, but it wouldn't be in character. Would be like Bernie Sanders suddenly revealing he was a 32 year old mother of three who was president of her college's young Republicans. Not in so many words.
That's exactly why everyone is losing their s--- over the R5.
Canon is (if these specs are correct) walking away from small iterative improvements and finally swinging for the fences.
Forget the camera itself. Canon as an imaging company may be finally prepared to spec war it out with Sony, which is nothing but a win for us.
- A
Imagine Front Button Focus. You'd still have your thumb free for other things.
Above, it was mentioned that Sony have the aluued-to A7Siii to come out. So maybe they are being sneaky with the - by giving long-lead announcements on the 8K it may reduce the impact of Sony's announcements whatever it is. A real spoiler, even if the Sony is released first.
Why is it "worse"?Or worse, they launch it but say it's '8K ready via a firmware update to be named later' and still ask you for $3499 for it now.