I need an new xl backpack

daniela

EOS RP
Aug 19, 2012
237
0
Hi Guys!
I´ve started looking for an new xl sized backpack.
My equipment for wildlife: 600mm L II, 100-400 L, 2 bodies, two smaller lenses, an flash and an extender to carry. And some food. Oh, yes and an tripod
My long time used Tamrac expedition 9 has been "retired" by my dog. :rolleyes:
Looking in the web, it brought me to Loewpro 650 pro trekker. This bulky backpack looks quite stable, but is heavy too.
Do you recommend another model for carrying heavy equipment with you?
f-stop seems to sell interesting models, but I do not know how robust they are.

Thank you a lot
Daniela
 
Last edited:

Del Paso

M3 Singlestroke
Aug 9, 2018
357
302
F Stop backpacks are highly recommendable, very satisfied with mine.
They are durable, modular and designed by photographers.
And they don't have front-opening!!!!!:)
And: can be fitted with a water-pouch!!!! :love:
 

Don Haines

Beware of cats with laser eyes!
Jun 4, 2012
7,877
1,207
Canada
I have a pro-runner 450. It is considerably lighter than the pro-tracker 450 or the 600.

Depending on what you have for lenses, you can get two bodies in there, but it really depends on your individual kit.
183881
 

LDS

EOS 6D MK II
Sep 14, 2012
1,490
106
My long time used Tamrac expedition 9 has been "retired" by my dog.
If you were satisfied by the Expedition 9, you can look at the Tamrac Anvil series also, which is its successor. It has the same capabilities to mount add-on pockets to fit it to your needs.
 

RGF

How you relate to the issue, is the issue.
Jul 13, 2012
2,816
35
I have put a 600, 200-400, 2 1DX-ii bodies, 70-20, and I think 24-70 into a gura gear bataflae. Lifting / carrying the best was difficult but everything did fit
 
Reactions: GMCPhotographics
Aug 22, 2010
1,571
267
48
Uk
www.GMCPhotographics.co.uk
I have a pro-runner 450. It is considerably lighter than the pro-tracker 450 or the 600.

Depending on what you have for lenses, you can get two bodies in there, but it really depends on your individual kit.View attachment 183881
That's a nice bag but it certainly won't fit a 600 II L in there.

My advice is to pick up a 2nd hand Gura Gear back pack. They are still the best large lens back pack available.
 

daniela

EOS RP
Aug 19, 2012
237
0
Thank you for all answers.
I´m going to see some of your rcommended bags in Munich at several shops.
The Gura gear bags look quite interesting, also the Anvil.
The f-Sop bags seem to be interesting too, but they are in the same weight class as the Lowerpro 650 with the ICU. Also the big lens ICU is out of production.
 

johnf3f

Canon 1Dx
Oct 25, 2012
913
15
Wales
I bought a used LowePro SuperTrekker a while back. Holds my 800 F5.6, 300 F2.8, 100-400, 24-70, 16-35 both camera bodies, 100 Macro and has room to spare. There are two side pouches for more lenses and a thermos flask of tea + an add on daypack for munchies and waterproofs + plenty of options to carry a tripod or two - 3? That should cover you! However do not fall over - you will never get up!
Realistically, more sensibly loaded, it is a VERY comfortable pack and with loads up to about 50/55 lbs, has loads of attachment points, the most comfortable harness system I have yet found. Now they are no longer made they are cheap too!
 

docsmith

EOS 6D MK II
Sep 17, 2010
835
182
The Mindshift/Think Tank First Light 40L is what I use (500 f/4) and seems to get a lot of press:
 

BobG

EOS M50
Jul 2, 2014
26
9
The Mindshift/Think Tank First Light 40L is what I use (500 f/4) and seems to get a lot of press:
I use the 40L whenever I'm using my 600F4 and I've found it to be very comfortable once correctly adjusted, and more than enough space for a couple of bodies + 600F4 +100-400, and a couple of free slots for 20-70F4 or filters etc. One slight warning, I measured it as being right on the limit in height for some aircraft carry-on, so you may want to check.
 

docsmith

EOS 6D MK II
Sep 17, 2010
835
182
I use the 40L whenever I'm using my 600F4 and I've found it to be very comfortable once correctly adjusted, and more than enough space for a couple of bodies + 600F4 +100-400, and a couple of free slots for 20-70F4 or filters etc. One slight warning, I measured it as being right on the limit in height for some aircraft carry-on, so you may want to check.
This is very true. Be careful not to overstuff and check your airlines size limitations. But I have flown with my 500 f/4 II in the 40L without issue. The other option that I've heard but have not yet tried is something like the Pelican luggage carry on. The 600 f/4 II should very snuggley fit in there, then, if it gets checked, it is at least in a hard case.
 

DominoDude

EOS 6D MK II
Feb 7, 2013
960
0
::1
I've just started looking into the new Mindshift Backlight Elite 45 from Think Tank. I'm not about to stuff it with a 600mm, but from their video it is said that it should be possible.